.com.unity Forums - MP Noobs and Vets II: Days of Infamy. MA, BI. Game Over. Supplicants Triumph!

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)

- Multiplayer and AARs (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=145)

- - MP: Noobs and Vets II: Days of Infamy. MA, BI. Game Over. Supplicants Triumph! (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=45227)

Re: Noobs and Vets II: Days of Infamy. MA, BI. 17/17. AI Creation Phase.

Regarding the mod, basically Chris says he can have the whole thing done in less than 24 hours if Ano and DrP say yes. You know I am fine with it, if it can be done in that time frame. Probably won't change my pretender choice really though, but it might benefit others.

Re: Noobs and Vets II: Days of Infamy. MA, BI. 17/17. AI Creation Phase.

It would change ours significantly and this boat has already sailed. If we can't just start with the rules we have I'll have to bow out until the next game.

Re: Noobs and Vets II: Days of Infamy. MA, BI. 17/17. AI Creation Phase.

DrPraetorious
Me too

Re: Noobs and Vets II: Days of Infamy. MA, BI. 17/17. AI Creation Phase.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPraetorious (Post 744043)

It would change ours significantly and this boat has already sailed. If we can't just start with the rules we have I'll have to bow out until the next game.

Very well, as I said, it won't happen without yours and Ano's agreement. The opportunity has been offered and we thank Chris for his efforts which may be of assistance to me in the next game.

Re: Noobs and Vets II: Days of Infamy. MA, BI. 17/17. AI Creation Phase.

Due to circumstances beyond my control.. I am without access to a computer. I have asked a few players to substitute in some of my positions.

However, I don't think it would be wise of me to commit to captaining a team at this time, and I don't see this getting resolved in less than a week.

I know that that people want to start - and that the game has been delayed. So I am completely ok with starting the game without me.

I'm really sorry to throw such a curve to the players, to my team, and especially my teammates.

Re: Noobs and Vets II: Days of Infamy. MA, BI. 17/17. AI Creation Phase.

update:

Sept, squirrel has volunteered to helm the usurpers, in my absence. Please hide the women and children, and give him access to the forums.

Re: Noobs and Vets II: Days of Infamy. MA, BI, Enlisting 16/17.

Since I seem to be subbing for Chris while his team gets going...

Quote:

Originally Posted by ano (Post 742248)

Quote:

As the usurpers have *very* poor pretender suggestions, I'd really like to restrict this to unlimited in your theme paths, 3 everywhere else.

Chris, I already said what I think regarding this. I am sure that S9W9 mictlan will be a balance-breaker in this game so while I don't mind it in general, I do mind it for Mictlan. If Mictlan is restricted to, say, W6S9, or just W9, I'm fine with it.
And regarding overall balance, while your team may not have the best starting conditions (although expansion possibilities are absolutely ok), you have simply fantastic perspectives from many good national summons, battle magics, communions etc and while I see the point in strengthening Children or Sanginarium, I am sure that your team has no need for further strengthening.

This is hilarious. *MA Mictlan*, the one with mere eagle warriors everywhere and no native blood magic, could be *unbalancing*. And so says the person captaining the team with *Shinuyama* and *Ermor*. Serious WTF. So yes, lets specially and specifically restrict the 'bad' Mictlan to make them even worse. Its not even worth playing with eagle warriors if you can't double major bless them (and even then, they really want a minor blood blessing or something in addition to that).

Whatever, I'm only going to be here briefly to get this going. I'm sure I'll find something that works for initial expansion. But Ano's argument here is ridiculous, and I can't actually believe he convinced anyone with it. (Also, this is going to force the 'unthematic' need to break into blood to have units even worth using which can be acquired somewhere other than the capital.)

Re: Noobs and Vets II: Days of Infamy. MA, BI. 17/17. AI Creation Phase.

Hello to every one...I am a little late in discussion,but if u are arguing about the patches for mictlan,my opinion is that this game (Dom3) never needed patches,I know that there where some bad sides and a lot of bugs but I have always considered patches unnecessary...So why to use patches but only due to new map:confused:

And this game still did not started,I thought the game is running allready...
PS
Theam Sanguinarium will win...:(

Re: Noobs and Vets II: Days of Infamy. MA, BI. 17/17. AI Creation Phase.

Quote:

But Ano's argument here is ridiculous, and I can't actually believe he convinced anyone with it.

Well, you may say it's ridiculous or whatever but allowing one team to have a super-bless (or two) while other have no even theoretical access to it IS imbalancing. And regarding "bad" Mictlan, I may prove you any time of the day that it is one of the strongest nations of the era. Yes, as well as Shinuyama and Ermor. And Pythium.

I'm glad to see you in and not glad to see Chris out. Hope he will return and help you later.

Re: Noobs and Vets II: Days of Infamy. MA, BI. 17/17. AI Creation Phase.

It is possible,I am not so experienced in PvP mode,but i allways considerd abysa and pangena the strongest nations...
Ok for pythium I would understand that thay are storng,I was playing with them first few months of my playing...but why ermor(in early age perhaps)...:confused:
And what is IS???

Sorry for so much questions but I am realy stubborn,and I am preaty slow on much things...:D