Re: Jets & Planes but no UAV's here.
 

It's really only a matter of what you load them with. The F-35A and C normally carry a pair of 2000# JDAMs and the F-35B 1000#ers as internal bomb load. So If you load them with only that they're currently rated +1 to their EW rating (should probably be +2 IMHO).

Then when loaded with internal and external stores, around 18,000 total for the A & C and 15,000 for the B (but of course most aircraft only actually about half their max bomb load as they need to also carry enough fuel to get someplace) their EW rating is (or should be) about the same as an F-16 (or perhaps 1 better since they are a semi-stealth aircraft whereas the F-16 is not).

Re: Jets & Planes but no UAV's here.
 

Japan’s first F-35A will make its maiden flight in September 2016

http://defence-blog.com/news/japans-...mber-2016.html


We'll see how this develops............

Re: Jets & Planes but no UAV's here.
 

This couldn't wait. The person involved was described as an amateur, but many spies start that way. What worries me from that industry source comment and that I'd like to ask them is, what are there feelings about a professional spy? Well you'll just have to read the article to see what I'm talking about. I promise you the "journey" will be worth it for what this spy plan involved.

Sourced from DID...
http://www.defensenews.com/story/def...ions/85695920/

Have a great "what ever" today. ;)

Regards,
Pat
:capt:

Re: Jets & Planes but no UAV's here.
 

What else is new?
Half the time during the Cold War the Kremlin knew what was in the pipes for new equipment before US field commanders did.

But being the rabid [insert the proper term for a female canine here] that I am ... I still think spies should be shot as tradition dictates.

Re: Jets & Planes but no UAV's here.
 

From another board; possible initial IOC of CHINESE Y-20 HEAVY TRANSPORT

Re: Jets & Planes but no UAV's here.
 

I know this is slightly off-topic, but each year, the Soviet Embassy would go to the US GPO and buy all the budget documents, discussion documents, etc published each year by the US Government through the GPO and then fly them out to the USSR, where they'd be analyzed.

You can learn a lot from the UNCLASS versions the GPO makes available.

Re: Jets & Planes but no UAV's here.
 

I've posted on this situation with both sources and "my humble opinion" as not necessarily towards the USMC and USAF directly but, the measures required by these branches of the military to maintain they're respective air fleets due to the various delays and cost overruns of the F-35. These issues are exasperated due to not being able to retire platforms, having to maintain those same platforms, training costs for pilots, maintenance crews and beyond maintenance issues the modernization of some of these same platforms. And maybe lives.

For instance, there would be no F/A-18 E/F "SUPER HORNET" series if not for the delay of the F-35C. In fact the USN is forced into buying more "SUPER HORNETS" as noted below. The UK might've rethought their position on at least selling their GR.7/9 HARRIERS to the USMC for their use as spares for the AV-8B II PLUS HARRIERS had they known 1) These delays would be ongoing and 2) They were stuck in having to proceed in completing both QUEEN ELIZABETH Class carriers which was not known at the time they retired their HARRIERS.
https://www.defenseindustrydaily.com...-flying-02816/

The planes that have truly benefited from this come from the USAF. In the shorter term that would be the A-10 with (They also brought some out of the boneyard as well due to OP TEMPO.) refurbished airframes and upgraded electronics suite to enhance both offensive and defensive capabilities.
http://www.airforce-technology.com/n...grades-4928602

In the medium term the F-16 later current versions have seen extensive and ongoing life extension programs to cover all noted for the A-10 and beyond. The long term winner I think some of you have figured out, of course, is the F-22 it has everything done as already mentioned and so much more especially related to the "complete package" directly related to the development of the F-35 program. It'll be flying to at least ~2040.

So back to the CORPS problem, of keeping flying and maintaining OP TEMPO and spending money that could have an impact on either their land programs or long term F-35B buys depending on how long these delays keep going on. Here's your story...
http://breakingdefense.com/2016/03/m...how-bad-is-it/
http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/stor...ower/81974498/
https://news.usni.org/2016/05/26/nav...surge-air-wing
http://www.janes.com/article/61166/u...capability-gap
http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-ne...s-marine-corps
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/mar...id=mailsignout


Economics will always drive military decisions whether in terms of money or, in our world slots.

Some of these planes will yet to be presented for inclusion here.

Regards,
Pat
:capt:

Re: Jets & Planes but no UAV's here.
 

A stealthy fighter/bomber only as long as the ammo stores are internal. Once those bomb doors open it is no longer stealthy. If it flies in CAS with external stores, and as I understand, with a reduced load as compared to the A-10, at least in the F-35B it is far from what the money bought.

The many variants of the F-16 are doing fighter/bomber and CAS roles just fine for the many Armed services around the globe.

I just hope they did not take away money from Navy medical to help fund this budget whale.

====

Sourced: http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/not...-wa-1730583428

Re: Jets & Planes but no UAV's here.
 

Always does.
I not-so-fondly remember taking up collections among the unmarried folks so the married ones could pay their rent/eat during the Carter years budget shenanigans.

The thing folks keep forgetting is the idea is the initial bombing missions with drastically reduced internal stores are to allow opposition air defense capabilities to be neutralized/reduced. After this has happened they can fly with full external stores, and be just as stealthy as say an F-16, because they no longer have to worry (near as much) about high-tech air defense weapons. Sure there will still be non-radar directed AA guns and MPADS and other heat seeking stuff but F-16s currently face that now and manage to still do their job.

Re: Jets & Planes but no UAV's here.
 

I warn you in advance the below is a very in depth analysis, the topic covers the broad range of issues concerning the RN/RAF use of the F-35, HARRIERS and the F/A-18A/G SUPER HORNETS. Also it covers Carrier Ops, coordinated Air Ops, Carriers (QE Class.) and weapons. These are a series of memorandums from Commander "Sharkey" Ward, DSC, AFC, RN, considered by many as "Father of HARRIER Ops" as sent to MOD and MP's. There are date tabs on the upper Left corner to guide you. To read this you must go to the bottom document and read down again and so on to the top of the ref. The time period covers March - June 2013. I'm only 3 or 4 in myself and find it very enlightening that parallels some of the issues we face here as well.
He has an excellent book out I read back around '95 while on patrol and just received a new hard bound ed. for my birthday just recently on HARRIER Ops during the Falklands War, its development and RN/RAF lack of understanding of it's operational capabilities along with inter services rivalries. Some might find it a interesting read though a little technical in the beginning.
Anyway here you go "Good Luck and Good Hunting"...
http://sharkeysworld2.blogspot.com/?view=classic

Regards,
Pat
:capt: