![]() |
Re: Please Help Me Tune My Man
Stand by your Man!
(Sorry, sorry, move along please) |
Re: Please Help Me Tune My Man
Quote:
|
Re: Please Help Me Tune My Man
Quote:
|
Re: Please Help Me Tune My Man
Jebus http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif
Just play each other and you can test your styles and see which one is 'better'. Or it could be that you play them both very well and each have their own advantages. I prefer early super-combatants to orb-specialists, so I use some of Alex's ideas, though I think NGF's are completely viable as well; depending on how and what you are playing. |
Re: Please Help Me Tune My Man
Quote:
I have been using Abyssian combat mages since I first began playing dom1 and Abyssia is historically my favourite race. While they do suffer they have their value. My standard first turn is to build an Anathement Dragon to command my first army and use all my resources on HI and/or Lava warriors while cashing in all my gems. The anthement Dragon can cast Flare in between Fantacism/Divine Blessing and gets onto the hall of fame. Fanaticism makes all the difference to early expansion and allows the use of the early small units approach which increases the reliability of early expansion with Abyssia. You'll notice the Cyclops mentioned had Air3. For . . . Eyes of Aiming. Anathement Salmanders are far from hopeless combat mages with Phoenix Power and Fire Ball. In the first MP game I played of Dom1 I ended up with a bunch of mages dominating the Hall of fame until my Ice Devils got going. I would choose wether or not I liked their heroic ability to decide wether or not to keep them as army mages or send them searching. With increased precison (Eyes of Aiming etc) Fire Balls etc become deadly and Falling Skies is a nice new addition. So yes I am speaking from experiance not just blowing smoke. Sure I want the precision of Abyssian mages improved but thats not because I don't use them - its because I use them and know how hard you have to work to make them effective. Sure I could give up on them because they score low on efficiency but if I approach themes/races like that they will all end up looking somewhat similar. Like Nagot I find Pythium et al somewhat unappealing and I'm more interested in trying to make less mainstream approaches work. You can find some hidden beauties (or monstrosities) with this approach. Cheers Keir ps If I was going to use Pythium I'd put together a mixed force of the 2 strat move legionaries and the emerald guard can go sit on their plumes. |
Re: Please Help Me Tune My Man
Quote:
However... I don't use eyes of aiming, ever, because I don't like to wound my commanders. And without them, Dom II Abyssian mages are about 1/10th as good as Dom I Abyssian mages in combat. Though flare seems to be working better than Fire Flies/Darts... hmmmm. Must be the prophet precision bonus, plus the 1 extra precision of Dragon versus Demonbred. And now that I look, the Dragon prophet gets 12 precision instead of 10 like it should. Hmmm... Well, that's an odd bug, or something. You got lucky=) P.S. Does Chest Wound or Eye Loss from a magic eye or heart heal, say from the Heal command or in an immortal, while the item is still in the commander? |
Re: Please Help Me Tune My Man
Which sacred troops do you think are justified even with their cost? I think Niefel giants are a no-brainer.
Quote:
|
Re: Please Help Me Tune My Man
Heh. Does anyone play the Druid for anything (stealth, perhaps) if his vine summoning isn't all that great?
Wardens make for a wonderful elite troop. I haven't seen anything wrong with bless effects on them, since they seem to be the perfect platform to build on; they're fast, stealthy, and hit a lot. Air definitely seems to be a good choice; I've already seen the power of taking a very high Nature http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif Not to mention the Warden Commander with Heroic Quickness tends to decimate things quickly; I even had some luck making him a flanker-attacking-rear instead of purchasing the very expensive Knights. |
Re: Please Help Me Tune My Man
Building around stealth is a subject unto itself. Players who build around visible armies tend to disregard stealth entirely since its often on units that they dont feel are worth using. To a lot of them stealth=scout.
I like stealth armies. Wardens (especially if you can add those druid archers) make a nice army. Mans ability to soften with Call of Wild/Wind makes it even better. Having stealth mages and priests is yet another step up since its so easy for them to completely setup shop in the new province. |
Re: Please Help Me Tune My Man
Joonie's question is interesting, but maybe it should make another thread. I've been wondering why some sacred units seem to be overlooked. Battle vestals seem almost equivalent to serpent dancers for cheaper, get around the lack of armor somehow and they look very appealing. And it seems with any minor bless heart companions are a better deal than standard hoplites...they only cost a little more, barely more upkeep (important for such sturdy units), and with the right blessing they get signifigantly better...some fire-9 heart companions can stop and repel the enemy and then hit back in force. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.