Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
 

I've been dying for a multiplayer game in Dom2 for a long time now. If there is a spot left, I'd love to join.

Preferences, Vanheim, Arco, Machaka... but I pretty much play anything.. =)

Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
 

im still absolutely flexible. I will play anything!

Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
 

Jotunheim, Man, Pythium

Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
 

I'd like in as well.

Atlantis,Machaka,Marignon depending on map...

Actually anything is fine...


Rabe the Torpid Turn-Based Tyro

Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
 

Well, I spent a bit working with everyones choices and with the wonderful thing that we call spreadsheets, and I think I've worked out who can get who that at least keeps most people happy. Lets see, if you didn't put up any suggestions (Dixie and Wan), I slotted you into the nations that remained open. Hope you enjoy them. So, here are the arrangements, in alphabetical order by player. =)

Blofeld Marignon
Carnifex Ermor
Cihset Vanheim
Dixie F Tien Chi
ExitJudas Ulm
freykin Mictlan
Izaqyos Atlantis
J Stanley R'yleh
Karacan Caelum
Lear Pythium
Patrik C'tis
Pillin Pangea
Quantum Arco
Rabelais Machaka
Sachmo Jotunhiem
ywl wan Abysia

And I think actually that that fills all the open spots. So, i'll be posting two or three map options momentarilly. Vote on them, and We'll get this game rolling.

Lear

Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
 

Or if you prefer it by nation:
Abysia ywl wan
Arco Quantum
Atlantis Izaqyos
Caelum Karacan
C'tis Patrik
Ermor Carnifex
Jotunhiem Sachmo
Machaka Rabelais
Marignon Blofeld
Mictlan freykin
Pangea Pillin
Pythium Lear
R'yleh J Stanley
Tien Chi Dixie F
Ulm ExitJudas
Vanheim Cihset

Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
 

Custom maps are fine with me.

[ January 28, 2004, 19:44: Message edited by: sachmo ]

Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Can I take Man instead? Abysia is one of the few I don't feel the most comfortable with...

Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Can I take Man instead? Abysia is one of the few I don't feel the most comfortable with... </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Nevermind... I change my mind. I'll take Abysia http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif .

Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
 

Wan, you can go ahead and have Man. That leave Abysia open for a new opponent if one shows up.

As for maps, I looked at a bunch of the custom ones, and then at what we have from illwinter, and the ones from illwinter looked much prettier. The only viable option that I found (especially for you water people) were:

Orania or Wars of Orania.

Proposed settings:
Independants: 6
Events: Common
Hall of Fame: 15
Sites: 50

Should we leave or disable the massive amount of informaiton that the charts give? I say disable, but that's just me.

I would suggest we use "Alexander's Luck" as a mod. You can download it and open it up with a word file to take a look at what it does: I think based on my playing so far that it helps balance out the luck scale, making order/turmoil not everyone's imediate choice.

Any other suggestions, or responses, post them. Once I hear back from a couple of you on maps I'll go ahead and post my email, and we can get this going.

Cheers,
Lear