Re: Is there an incongruous distribution of magic?
 

Seeking arrow is like all assassination spells a very good situationnal spell.

Your opponent has a 120 units army lead by only 3 commanders threatening to renforce his main army ? You spam 5 or 6 seeking arrows and all the leaders are dead, the army don't move (and perhaps won't move next turn, if he had no leader moving to the province).

As well killing a key mage can change the result of a big battle, and the spell is particularly good to achieve isolated mages after a retreat (or for surprise attacks on researchers when dome spells aren't available).

Re: Is there an incongruous distribution of magic?
 

Ooo. That saves me from going to count all the eras.

I'm curious, though, whether the unequal distribution is a design decision or whether it just turned out that way after you guys made a bunch of different nations.

And is there any plan to even them out? Because sometimes I open up the game and just think to myself, "I want to play a Fire nation today," but realize I dislike my options intensely.

Re: Is there an incongruous distribution of magic?
 

HotNife: I believe the common answer to that is, 'Mod your own.' I actually have about 3 ideas for mods right now, one of which I'm surprised no one else has done yet.

Re: Is there an incongruous distribution of magic?
 

Agreed. In most MP cases seeking arrow won't be used too often, but once in awhile a barrage of them in a sensitive province is very much worth the investment.

I've used them to really disrupt large armies that rely on communions. 3A to probably/possibly kill a support mage is a pretty good trade - especially if it makes that army vulnerable.