Re: Ummh
 

I think many of you may be missing the fact that the ad is targetting pretty blond women that like to hang out in comfortable clothes and play PBEM strategy games. It is a viable demographic with plenty of discretionary income. As the forum soon fills with blond women we will hear "Bambi whipped my Ulm butt with her GOR Tartarian Monstrum" ... and the like.

-SSJ

Re: Ummh
 

This guy figured it out.

Re: Ummh
 

http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...es/biggrin.gif

I thought the add was funny.

So where do Dominion 3 players like her hang out. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...ies/tongue.gif

Re: Ummh
 

http://www.shrapnelgames.com/Banners_2004/IWantMyD3.jpg if you can't get it to load.

I dunno about the ad. It doesn't explain anything about what Dominions 3 is. I suppose given the context this being a wargamer board, it's interesting, but why not have her playing Dom 3? I think that would be way cooler. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/laugh.gif

Are there any girls that play Dom 3 though? I have a feeling this game is just too geeky, but I would be glad to hear if I am wrong about that.

Anyway is that ad still going to be around on Wednesday? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif

Oh by the way, can someone translate this into English? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif Just for the sake of exploring postmodernist theory, which I'm somewhat interested in, does Dominions 3 challenge the accepted order / master narrative in any meaningful way however it is advertised? I mean it's a fun indie game, but like you're conquering the world in Dom 3 just like every other 4X. I would love to see fighting for global domination in Dom 3 as cool and subversive, but I can't see how that could be. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif

Re: Ummh
 

That is one strategically placed cushion! Obviously a very appropriate ad for a strategy game.

Re: Ummh
 

I clicked on the ad just to show that there were no hard feelings over the peel ad and to support my favorite grognards at Shrapnel. (It is worth noting that I am not one who normally clicks on ads. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif )

Re: Ummh
 

I think I used modernism/postmodernism somewhat confusingly, but that is because I was presenting two different viewpoints in one. I will break it down:

1. modernism is the result of modernity. Modernity is the result of the enlightenment (order and reason, that there is a thing such as reason, everything is knowable, everything is orderable; perfection is both possible and desirable).

1a. modernism is both a reaction against the enlightenment ideals of modernity, but rooted in them. It was a rage against order, but a celebration of individuality, freedom, and mass culture. These things are all the result of "universal man". Modernity, the enlightenment, created "universal man" in opposition to "situated man". Situated man is the non-universal, entrenched in tradition and the past; things the enlightenment believes corrupt true Reason. So modernity creates "universal man", a man of pure reason and universality. But now universal man is above the order that created him, he is universal, he has no reason to be beholden to whatever created him. He reacts against order using its own ideals of universality and freedom. Thus: Modernism.

2. Postmodernism is the result of postmodernity. Postmodernity is the result of modernism. It is the crass, limitless, fragmented, mass culture that modernism created, and that we are all comfortable with today.

2a. Some authors blame 'modernism' for the boundlessness of contemporary culture. They say capitalism worked just fine, it was the raucous modernism activity, the beatniks, the hippies, the radical movements, the permissiveness, that caused modernity to decay into postmodernity. These authors say modernism is dead, and it is time to return to the ordered ideals of the enlightenment. The enlightenment didn't fail, modernism did.

2b. Some authors blame 'capitalism' for the boundlessness of contemporary culture. They say modernism was a solution to mass growth of urban life and culture. But that capitalism, not modernism, created and encouraged the permissiveness and boundlessness of contemporary culture. Capitalism had an unquenchable need to accumulate, accumulate. Make more and more. Sell more and more. Everyone buy buy buy. This lead to capitalism creating permissiveness in culture; which leads us in postmodernism.

Because of these two different perspectives, you will see 'modernism' used to refer to both the belief in order, and the reaction against it. 'Postmodernism', whenever it is used, is a reference, sometimes celebration, of the fragmentation of life, of self, of the society we have today.

Whenever someone uses the term 'Postmodernism', they will always then refer to 'Modernism' as the belief in order and reason. They see modernism and postmodernism as a coherent dialect, the first caused the other. These are people who argue that capitalism, not modernism, caused postmodernity. Capitalism is the root of fragmentation.

Those who believe modernism is to blame for postmodernity, do not often use the term 'postmodernism'. For them, modernism turned into postmodernism, there really is no difference between them. Modernism was the fragmentation all along.

Re: Ummh
 

I think there was once one female of the species that played Dom 3, but she has since disappeared from the boards (I did not stalk her).

Re: Ummh
 

Maybe she's the Dom_3 female intern KO mentioned from earlier posts.

http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif

Re: Ummh
 

That's what they should caption the ad with.

...!

Something just occurred to me, maybe this is an April Fool's prank.