![]() |
Re: Helheim - lets burn some rubber
Thanks for the encouraging words guys. I generally write a guide for a nation I feel is under appreciated, when I can find a competitive angle that seems to be mostly overlooked. When I wrote the Hinnom guide they were brand new, and I don't think anybody (including me when I started) appreciated how strong they were.
MA Oceana is the only nation I've picked up and tried hard to polish, only to fail. In my opinion they are not only the weakest nation I've played, but horribly crippled. We had a fun thread awhile ago with some thematic suggestions to add to them, but as they are now I can't come up with anything remotely competitive to do with them after your initial expansion. Perhaps somebody more clever than me could, but I failed. I heard a request for Niefelheim and Yomi, I'll see if I can find some inspiring stuff to write for these. |
Re: Helheim - lets burn some rubber
I'd like a Niefel guide that doesn't use a heavy bless, since the heavy bless method is very well known. Something that makes good use of the Skratti too.
|
Re: Helheim - lets burn some rubber
Quote:
I have to disagree with you on the indie research angle though. You have to consider the opportunity cost. You're switching from drain-2 to magic-3, which costs 200 design points and makes your thugs more vulnerable to counters in your own dominion. Not sure where you intend to get those design points from, but that's a huge opportunity cost right off the bat. You suggest sacred shamans, so you're putting up 5 labs plus temples - were you putting up castles to, or hoping nobody raids you, pops your temples and kills all your researchers? So 4500-9000 gold before you start paying for the mages themselves depending on your tolerance for risk. So, on top of the straight gold opportunity cost there's the time opportunity cost of gathering that gold, building the infrastructure, and recruiting the mages. This actually is a very good illustration of the very heart of my thesis for this guide. Assuming you're not suggesting you can line all this up in the first year you've got a whole hell of a lot of catchup to do to my suggested strategy which, if luck is with you is cranking out 50 research point generators (4 skull mentors + 3 mages) per turn by the end of year one. It's just not remotely in the same ballpark, I don't think it's even possible to catch up in a best case scenario. It's the difference between being an extremely solid first place in research and being mediocre at best. It's the difference between virtually being assured to snag the chalice and then pump out Tartarians while everyone else has their thumbs up their butts, or playing catchup as people research solid counters to your sacred troops and thugs. This is what I was trying to convey with my metaphor about not dancing on your lame foot. Its a bad idea to focus on your weaknesses, you're never going to be competitive like that. Focus on your strengths and *circumvent* your weaknesses. Dumping that huge opportunity costs into getting still rather bleh research is...bad. |
Re: Helheim - lets burn some rubber
Quote:
|
Re: Helheim - lets burn some rubber
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Helheim - lets burn some rubber
I'm planning a Yomi guide when I get back to playing some heavy MP's but it'll be nice to see some alter views on it.
|
Re: Helheim - lets burn some rubber
Quote:
Sorry, I actually took cold-2 to squeeze in the points, though you can tweak this as you like. |
Re: Helheim - lets burn some rubber
Quote:
You don't have to build forts to protect your temples, just set the researchers to retreat, unless there's enough of them that you *want* them supporting the PD (which they can't do from inside a fort). So yeah, 4500 setup cost (5 labs, 5 temples for indies) vs. 5100 (3 labs, 3 temples, 3 forts for Vanjarls) although the indies have obvious disadvantages too. Note that I'm not even necessarily suggesting that you have to build the indies, just that it becomes an attractive option which you rule out by taking Drain in favor of an awake pretender. Quote:
Quote:
-Max Edit: just to re-emphasize, Baalz is more likely to be right than I am about anything involving MP, because I only play SP. Maybe Helheim really does need the early research to stave off attackers. |
Re: Helheim - lets burn some rubber
Well written guide Baalz - thanks for the insights. I agree that the conventional dual bless for the Heims is fun in the short-run, but not really viable in the long-run, at least that was my experience with Van - have never tried Helheim in MP.
Interestingly, elements of this strategy actually parallel a strategy for LA TC. They have ready access to E2 and D2 mages (all their "Ancestor" mages have some D so D gem income is easy to get up and running) and putting hammer-forged Skull mentors on 100GP sacred Masters of the Way is, as you say, like nitrous on your research, and you can use an Earth blessing on small bands of sacred Ancestor Vessels to easily expand. |
Re: Helheim - lets burn some rubber
[quote=Baalz;663456][quote=MaxWilson;663442]if luck is with you is cranking out 50 research point generators (4 skull mentors + 3 mages) per turn by the end of year one. It's just not remotely in the same ballpark, I don't think it's even possible to catch up in a best case scenario. It's the difference between being an extremely solid first place in research and being mediocre at best. QUOTE]
Hey Baalz I agree with most of your analysis most of the time. However assuming a first place research on the strength of skull mentors is overstating the case. Competitive research - sure. But you will still fall behind any nation utilizing skull mentors without a magic drain, yet with a competent research mage. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.