![]() |
Re: Lewis gun higher accuracy than Bren?
Quote:
I think there's a greater chance of hitting a larger team though. Isn't this why snipers, even once spotted, are such a pain to KO? Regardless, my main concern is for realism where possible; so a two man team just makes more sense. cheers, Cross |
Re: Lewis gun higher accuracy than Bren?
Quote:
|
Re: Lewis gun higher accuracy than Bren?
[quote=Cross;692084
I think there's a greater chance of hitting a larger team though. Isn't this why snipers, even once spotted, are such a pain to KO? [/QUOTE] I don't think so, I remember reading here somewhere that one of the sniper classes special attributes was the ability to convert a killing shot into extra surpression. I might have it wrong, but I think that's one of the reasons they are so hard to kill. Matt |
Re: Lewis gun higher accuracy than Bren?
Regarding earlier comments about Lewis gun 3 man team seems sensible for it, 2 to share carrying one with the ammo.
On the tea front Hoplitis was nearly right but from watching the gas board at work it would be 1 on the gun & 2 for tea duty |
Re: Lewis gun higher accuracy than Bren?
Quote:
(The UK section should be LMG group + separate rifle group to reflect the special UK tactics, but weeny little 2-3 teams just die quickly in SP. Especially due to the rule that ~50% casualties is a crippled element. SP sections are best as unitary ones, not groups) They may be size 0 - I would just ignore them as junk though. In any case, firing gets you spotted. Even if size 0. Andy |
Re: Lewis gun higher accuracy than Bren?
The usual squad formation in many armies is something like a rifle group and a gun (LMG) group. Now as the LMG is the main firepower of the squad the lance corporal {squad 2IC} is put in charge of it. So gunner, loader and corporal makes a 3 man team.
Best Regards Chuck. |
Re: Lewis gun higher accuracy than Bren?
I'd assumed the LMG teams were for scenario design, to create a MG post for certain situations; or were similar to the frequent two man AT teams we often see in SP. One must assume the AT teams are part of a section/squad and have a Corporal over them somewhere (perhaps he's back at Platoon HQ brewing the tea ;-)
I think Andy makes a good point about vulnerable small teams. The AT teams are expensive, and don't do very well in SP. I rarely use them, and when my opponent uses them they are easily KO. Perhaps they are only useful sitting in ambush at some crossroads. |
Re: Lewis gun higher accuracy than Bren?
Quote:
The independent AT teams "section" are not really historical in the UK OOB - but can be used to represent the separating out of the platoon AT teams as tank hunters as was done. The small 2 man AT teams can be useful in WW2 (they definately are in MBT when they have RPG and MAW, with useful ranges and accuracy) - but only if held behind the rifle sections, not advanced out in front of the platoon. If seen they soon die, esp if 1 casualty makes them require rallying (50% casualties) to do anything. Andy |
Re: Lewis gun higher accuracy than Bren?
Quote:
Was that a typo or an opinion?:D:D:D |
Re: Lewis gun higher accuracy than Bren?
Quote:
Andy |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.