Re: T-72b Rogatka
 

Apparently I am speaking to myself here.

The vehicle in question has a vision of 60.

Re: T-72b Rogatka
 

50 is still greater than 40, and according to your previous posts it should not be correct since it can still further than the most modern MBT and Helos you keep bringing up.
But as I explained there are good reasons for giving radar extra range over optical systems and this is in fact well established in the game.
I hope that that has finally sunk in.
50 is a convention because the radar fitted to those vehicles were simple surveillance types.
So now you wonder why this vehicle wound 60, comparable to high end gunships?
Because it is a modern millimetric set, exactly like the one mounted on said gunships and exactly unlike the others ground vehicles. Hence 60.

Now if you want to argue that the Khrizantema radar does not deserve 60 and should be knocked back to 50 or 55 because it is a POS compared to Longbow, then you might actually be arguing something pretty reasonable. Given however we both know nothing and nada about its characteristics beyond "modern millimetric set" I am not sure where facts are going to come from.

Re: T-72b Rogatka
 

This is fruitless. Let's just agree to disagree Marcello.

Re: T-72b Rogatka
 

Going back to T-72B Rogatka - the first date 1/06 is doubtful. Tekhnika i Vooruzhenie 8/2007 still treat it as being in development stage. Maybe 1/08. BTW, gun is designated 2A46M5.
PS - I've just found that Russian Wikipedia says, that it is not produced in series (without source).

Michal

Re: T-72b Rogatka
 

The actual gun designation is irrelavantwe do not care about the guns in this case as it's the ammo that advances. The Russian tank guns in the game are set up as combinations of Sabot and HEAT ammunition advancements. In this case the sabot rating goes up over the 125mm Gun 00


Don

Re: T-72b Rogatka
 

I know - this was just by the way, if somebody wanted to change system (M5 is obviously better, than M4 ;))