![]() |
Re: The UAV Club
Manufacturing of standarised bombs for UAV is already on the way
https://en.defence-ua.com/industries...ombs-6270.html https://en.defence-ua.com/analysis/h...tant-6229.html meaby its time to add this small robots also as a bombers inside game ?? |
Re: The UAV Club
Then we need to prepare to enter them for at least 2/3 of all the OOB's in the game. We have SO MANY COUNTRIES that don't even have any UAV'S etc. etc. in this game but, in the RL do.
To some degree it at times boils down to the "Have and Have Nots" but more to the point it was more a case of the few having the technology versus those that didn't at the time for several years until the technology became more widespread. I believe when I started this, that in my first Post, I hoped someone or others would do the submissions in this area. Also, I'm sure I also posted just a small portion of what was already available back then. EDIT: Just note the dates between my Post 11 and the next Post 12 from me. Kind of indicative of what I already wrote about next below. The push has always been Armor and Artillery and to a somewhat lesser extent Infantry, Helos, Planes and Jets etc. etc. The thread Posts and Views speak volumes to what I just noted above. To qoute one of my all-time favorite movies and taking Armor and Artillery from above into consideration, "Are you not entertained!?!" So, there you go in a "nutshell". Regards, Pat :capt: |
Re: The UAV Club
Weapon Class=27 (NLOS ATGM, i.e. no line of sight anti-tank guided missile) does a pretty good job of replicating a suicide drone. As to armed ones, there are several in the US and USMC OOBs.
The REAL question is how many do people have? Is a dozen, fifty, one hundred of something worth creating a unit/formation for? If you need one just use the "Captured" option when purchasing forces. |
Re: The UAV Club
Not a UAV per se but close enough and supposedly they are being given to Ukraine
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...ion-detonating Build enough of these things and the effect on an armoured assault would be little different than the English Longbowmen at Agincourt\ Longbow would be an excellent name for something like this... way better than ALTIUS-600M |
Re: The UAV Club
Here are articles about others new bombs for Ukraine drones which will use a dive bomber tatics like Ju-87 stuka and after release of bomb will come back to operator so this will be not a suicide drone.
https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and...ideo-6364.html https://mil.in.ua/en/news/ukrainian-...or-fpv-drones/ Russian from others side using now various drones with MON-50 mines in one way missions. https://en.defence-ua.com/news/fpv_d...e_of-6376.html |
Re: The UAV Club
Quote:
The main issue is ... How many do they have? It's highly impractical to create a unit and formation for something that exists only in small quantities, i.e. less then say 500. There are a limited number of unit slots in each OOB (999) and many of the major nations have them filled already since the game covers a 75 year time frame. So what do you remove to add something new? Take advantage of the ability to purchase units from any OOB and date range via the use of the "Captured" option. If you want you can give the 1946 Soviets an M1A2 SEP Abrams. |
Re: The UAV Club
I was wondering how such a small drone could take out tanks when it was designed as an anti-personal weapon.
That's because it can't. The USA is no longer buying them (SB 300) and the SWITCH BLADE 600 is a private venture project NOT BOUGHT by the USA. From the ref. "The Wrong Tool for the Job? We have more information and more videos of the Switchblade 300 in Ukraine, where the response has been lukewarm. This is a different type of war, and the key targets are Russian tanks, air defenses, and artillery for which the anti-personnel Switchblade 300 is unsuited. A larger version, the Switchblade 600, was promised to Ukraine last year and small numbers have reportedly arrived in the last few weeks. This version was launched as a private venture and has not yet been acquired by the U.S. military. The upsized loitering munition boasts longer range and a more powerful warhead capable of destroying armored vehicles." https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/techn...073fc8f0&ei=31 I don't know how it's set up for the game against armor, artillery and anti-air sites but as the article suggests it's not been successful against those targets. It's a "sniper weapon" for precision strikes against people we don't like in the terrorist business etc. Regards, Pat :capt: |
Re: The UAV Club
Given the range, warhead size, and weight of the Switch Blade 300 I really don't see it being any more useful then just replacing it with more 120mm mortar ammo.
That said if you need a couple for an ambush/raid/etc. they could be useful ... BUT ... useful enough to bother buying, storing, maintaining, training in the use of, transporting to the right place at the right time to be used? |
Re: The UAV Club
Quote:
|
Re: The UAV Club
Well, this will be where I'll put my defensive anti-drone info alongside what's already here as these issues are "hand in hand" topics.
Some of what's really not being mentioned here; APS: "Manufacturers are taking notice already of how readily adaptable hard-kill APSs might be for tackling uncrewed aerial threats. Israel's Elbit Systems says its Iron Fist system "can detect a drone or a loitering munition at around 1.5 km range" and has "successfully engaged drones simulating loitering munitions attack profiles" in testing, according to a story last year from EDR Online. Iron Fist is a hard-kill APS that uses small active electronically scanned array (AESA) radars as its primary sensors to spot incoming threats and then uses projectiles with explosive warheads fired from small turreted launchers to knock them down. Passive infrared sensors are also an option for use with Iron Fist." From this month. https://news.yahoo.com/tank-active-p...000944906.html USA LIDS/USMC MADIS (Same system overall.) : "Advantages KuRFS and Coyote bring to the Army’s LIDS KuRFS: LIDS is deployable as either mobile or fixed, relocatable platforms. Multi-mission KuRFS is so accurate, it can detect a 9mm bullet, and it has few false alarms or dropped tracks. The radar offers flexibility of fixed relocatable (KuRFS) and mobile (Ku720) deployment options. Precision targeting KuRFS discriminates between actual targets and clutter. Coyote: Coyote is able to down drones at longer ranges and higher altitudes than other systems. Coyote Block 2 kinetic effectors defeat single drones and swarms of varied size and maneuverability. The Coyote effectors are affordable; therefore, cost-effective to counter UAS threats." From AUG. 2023. https://breakingdefense.com/2023/08/...gainst-drones/ What does "kinetic effectors" sound like to you? That's right, exactly what APS uses. The above testing took place in the Summer of 2022 if I read it correctly. Seen a couple of articles while looking into this that are saying the USA has already fielded them. I can say for sure that the USMC MADIS will be fielded MAYBE this year, have to re-read the article I saved on MADIS and will post it in here. There is so much going on defensive systems but to a degree is being "lost" on all the offensive side of the discussion. Andy and Dons problem will be with some OOB's is where to put it all with all the new "standard" game land and air equipment to come and what's not already in but, ready to be added as they are fielded. Something I know they are well aware of. Regards, Pat :capt: |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.