.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Space Empires: IV & V (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   LOTR -DVD Info (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=5509)

Atrocities August 14th, 2002 03:10 AM

Re: LOTR -DVD Info
 
You know I have to chime in hear and say that I for one feel cheated by what they pulled here. I wanted to buy only one DVD, not two. For them to release the first DVD without the extra footage, only to be releasing it in 3 months from now is a cheep and down right dirty trick. If I had not tossed the reciept, I would have returned the movie immedately. Now, I am only going to rent the next release, not buy it. It was a dirty will trick, and one that should not be tolerated. It was a cheep little way to exploite more money out of people. It was cheep and insulting.

tesco samoa August 14th, 2002 03:33 AM

Re: LOTR -DVD Info
 
AT... I mentioned that in the orginal post... That there will be a second release later on in the year.... They announced that right from the beginning.... Sugar that was March 28th... were did this year go...

Tesco runs off and looks under the couch... not there...

CNCRaymond August 14th, 2002 03:57 AM

Re: LOTR -DVD Info
 
He forgets things. Just let it go. He will remeber something you told him a year ago sometime next year. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

Instar August 14th, 2002 04:38 AM

Re: LOTR -DVD Info
 
I got the precioussses DVD's...
much awesomeness

and waaaaaaaaaay OT but Tesco your pic looks like a pimp... sorry he just looks like a pimp to me
(and Ive been playing GTA3 some and now Im trained to shoot pimp looking type peoples)

Singollo August 14th, 2002 03:18 PM

Re: LOTR -DVD Info
 
Yes, I too felt cheated by the release of a "non-extra-footage" DVD. I suppose that if I had done my homework, I would have known about the extended edition to be released in November. Oh, well, I'm a sucker for this sort of thing anyway...I own at least five different copies of the Star Wars videos. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

Quote:

Yes, it's great to see so many things from Tolkien's work made into cinematic images. But it's also impossible to make proper images of many of them, and also impossible to tell the whole story without making at least six movies, not three.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">The amount of material left out, and changed, is definitely a big big problem for the story. That isn't even my main objection, though. By definition--stated and implied--the material that Tolkien is writing about cannot be visualized. The act of picturing, of grasping with the physical senses, corrupts and destroys the very essence of the subject matter that makes it so powerful and beautiful. We are not supposed to "see" an Elf. We are not supposed to be able to comprehend the beauty of Arwen, or the stature of Galadriel. We are not supposed to be able to grasp the terror of the Nazgul, or the horror of the Balrog, etc., etc. The central theme to Tolkien's work is that of the fading of magic and power and beauty from the world, from the splendor of the First Age to the muted fantasy of the Third Age, to the mundane world that we live in now. The characters and events from the earlier Ages are attainable only by imagination, and by fleeting glimpses; the very idea of throwing Arwen up onto a screen, of saying "hey, this is Arwen, check her out"...it tramples upon everything that Tolkien was doing. It's repugnant.

So, yeah....complicated feelings all around. Admiration and respect for this particular movie clashes with abhorrence and deep loathing of the idea of making a movie of the story.

Quote:

Singollo, that is why I said "mostly written".
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">True. I'm nitpicking, I know. Still, it bears saying: not a word of what appears in The Silmarillion was written before LotR, so technically, even "mostly written" is incorrect. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif

geoschmo August 14th, 2002 03:54 PM

Re: LOTR -DVD Info
 
Well, as I understand it the box set still to come has stuff that's not in the two disc package that's out now. So you would want to get both anyway, right?

Hey, you gotta spend your money on something. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif

Geoschmo

dogscoff August 14th, 2002 04:00 PM

Re: LOTR -DVD Info
 
Quote:

Hey, you gotta spend your money on something.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I like your philosophy. If you're running out of things to spend your money on, spend it on me!

FWIW, I think it's a rip off releasing the two Versions like that. They're just exploiting the fact that a lot of Tolkien fans are completist types who just have to own it all.

geoschmo August 14th, 2002 04:48 PM

Re: LOTR -DVD Info
 
[quote]Originally posted by dogscoff:
Quote:

I like your philosophy. If you're running out of things to spend your money on, spend it on me!
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Uh....no.

Singollo August 14th, 2002 05:20 PM

Re: LOTR -DVD Info
 
Quote:

Well, as I understand it the box set still to come has stuff that's not in the two disc package that's out now. So you would want to get both anyway, right?
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I'm not exactly sure of everything that's in it, but I got the impression that the extended edition will have pretty much everything that's on the 2-disc set...only with lots and lots of other stuff. If so, then it's the current release that is the waste, not the extended edition. It's a pretty sharp marketing strategy, granted ("Hey, let's release an earlier Version with only some of the extra stuff, and people will buy that thinking that it has all of the bells and whistles!"), but it still kind of stinks. I would have happily waited until the extended edition was all finished; I didn't need to be "tided over" for a few months.

Quote:

Hey, you gotta spend your money on something.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Heh. Too true. I'm currently upgrading my computer now, and it's always fun picking and choosing what new computer goodies to throw my money away on. It's not enough that I waste all of my time on games, I have to throw away my paychecks too. I've just upgraded to 512MB RAM, and now I'm trying to decide if the GeForce 4 is really necessary right now. Then there's the optical mouse I want to get...ack!!

geoschmo August 14th, 2002 05:42 PM

Re: LOTR -DVD Info
 
Well, I was sort of joking about buying both, although I am sure there will be many that will. And if they want too, more power to them. No one was forced to buy the first one, and the box set coming in Nov was not a secret.

I don't see having two Versions for sale as a bad thing though. The set coming out in Nov is a "directors cut" with 30 more minutes of movie, and a bunch of other stuff. Trading cards, figurines, etc, as well as three disks with a lot of stuff. And it's going to be a bit pricey. 50 - 80 bucks IIRC.

Personally I have no intention of buying that Version, and if it were the only Version available I would likely have not bought any. 30 bucks is about my limit per movie normally.

Although I may spring for the inevitable three movie box set that I am sure will be offered after all the movies have been released in a couple more years. But maybe not. I might just get each movie as it comes and leave it at that.

Geoschmo


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.