![]() |
Re: Question, Armor and mines
Couldn't you reduce the mines per sector down to say 10, and then remove the Mine Sweepers completely?
That way, going thru a mine field would be risky, would stop large concentrations of them, and would give you the ability to lay them in strategic places in-system. It would also give more incentive to build larger mines, something I never do. |
Re: Question, Armor and mines
Quote:
|
Re: Question, Armor and mines
I don't know Q. It just doesn't seem all that hard to me to build and maintain 5 or 6 LC's and include them in with my war fleets. Especially since once I get BC's I suddenly have a lot of LC's laying around to retrofit to minesweeper duty. At 100 mines per sector it just really isn't that hard to counter mines in the mid to late game. And it's TOO hard to counter them in the early game IMHO. They are an impenartrable wall, putting a crippling obstalce against any sort of early game wars. And then suddenly you throw a switch, and they are useless.
Your suggestion for settings.txt would certainly be better than the current situation. However it is beyond my power to implement. Baron has been asking Malfador for a long time for a chance based system for minesweeping and it hasn't been done. His suggestion was much more involved than a simple settings.txt entry. It allowed for differences from race to race in sweeping proficency. You point about minesweepers having only one use and armor having more than one is valid. My ideal would be a combination of Baron's ideas, and an ability for minesweeping components that allowed them to be destroyed as they sweep. Then you could keep the warhead damage levels high. You could have the sweepers protect all the ships in the fleet, without having to armor every ship. But you would still require the fleet to stop after a few minefields and repair themselves. But all that would require hard code changes. Geoschmo |
Re: Question, Armor and mines
Quote:
About the only use in the late game for mines would be to heavily mine the other guys territory. This would require some time to setup and either doing it under cover of a treaty, or by having cloaking devices, which can also be defeated. It is possible to do, but even then it's more of a nuisance than anything else. Sweepers are so cheap you could simply have a few stationed in each system to ferry ships around. Geoschmo |
Re: Question, Armor and mines
I basically agree with you Geoschmo that mines are too powerful in the early and too weak in the late game. I just think the difference is not that enormous.
The minesweeping components to clear 100 mines cost alone 10000 minerals. Therefore the cost to build and more important to maintain a sufficient number of minesweepers can be important. And if you find this still too cheap, it can of course be modified and increased. The changes MM made in the Last patch with new mounts/damage types gives me hope that the mine suggestions could be realized too in a future patch if we continue to ask for it. |
Re: Question, Armor and mines
Quote:
|
Re: Question, Armor and mines
Just an idea I am going to try:
Reduce damage of mine warheads to 1/4 = 25/50/75kT for Level I/II/III. Create mine mount for medium and large mines that increase the warhead damage by 2x repectively 4x. Increase tech level requirement for medium and large mines to 3 respectively 5. Increase cost of minesweeping components by factor 4! Expected results: small mines are quite weak, but because with the new patch their damage stacks not completely ineffective. This might balance the too high power of mines in the early game. For the later game it is important to research and use the larger mines. Minesweeping gets very expensive. |
Re: Question, Armor and mines
I like the idea some. I think it would help in the early game. However I am unconvinced it will accomplish what I want in the late game. The fact is no matter what you do to minesweepeing component cost it's still a formula. You change the values of the equation some, but there is still a solution. Once the player gets to the point where they can build and support enough sweepers mines become irrelevant to the attacking fleet. It's all or nothing. Your fleet will roll through field after field with no pause or concern from the mines. I want you to have to take your time. Not to stop you completely, but to make you take your time when going from planet to planet. I want to make wars in the late game be campaigns instead of just an inexorable drive from planet to planet towards the heart of the enemy empire. The only way to do that that I can think of is to make you take some damage from the mines. Not enough to critically damage the fleet, unless the other guy gets lucky or you don't prepare carefully, but enough to slow you down and make you more methodical about things.
Geoschmo |
Re: Question, Armor and mines
I absolutely agree that it is not the ideal solution, but it was the best thing I could find without a change made by MM.
The best as I said would be a moddable percent of minesweeping failure (depending on the mine size/tech level), maybe combined with a moddable percent of hit failure of the mine itself. That would create a degree of uncertainty we both seem to like with mines. On the other hand, if you can build many ships that cost about 50000 minerals each (that will be the cost of a minesweeper in my mod that can sweep 100 mines) don't you think that you have won the game already? |
Re: Question, Armor and mines
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.