![]() |
Re: Two down and two to go
hmmm thinking about this one all weekend.
I believe what they did there was wrong. Excessive force. I think that they should have been captured and put on trial. As they would have been shown for what mosters they where. And they would have been able to reveal all that they knew about Iraq, wmd, Halliburton etc... hmmm... Perhaps that is why they were killed with such excessive force. |
Re: Two down and two to go
Tesco, if they wanted to kill them the battle would have been over in about 15 minutes. The only reason it took so long is they were trying their damndest to take them alive and to avoid collateral damage to the neighborhood. So yes it's unfortunate they were killed and didn't stand trial, but don't try to say they did something wrong. The first soldiers on the scene didn' teven know who they were trying to capture other then it was high level officials.
Geoschmo |
Re: Two down and two to go
Quote:
Quote:
[ July 28, 2003, 22:30: Message edited by: Jack Simth ] |
Re: Two down and two to go
Quote:
Yeah, play nethack for a week straight and it's kinda hard to break the habit of thinking what you might get for eating that monster, isn't it? Just think of them as a 'quest' items. The bodies of these monsters are needed to accomplish something else. |
Re: Two down and two to go
ah yes 4 lightly armed men going up against 101st airborne company with support. They only had ak47 and pistols.
hvt 2, 3 should have been captured alive at all costs from an intelligence point of view. perhaps instead of 50 cal, tows , kiowa helicopters they could have used a swat team with teargas or just a plain old simple wait them out. I do believe that hvt 2 and 3 were more important alive than dead. that is all i am saying. And with the way the attack was laid out. 4 hours is about right with the various stages of the attacks. As it went from initial contact to verification. |
Re: Two down and two to go
Quote:
And I agree with you it would have been better had they been taken alive. And I believe the military does as well. But waiting has some serious risks from their escape, to counter attacks from other forces under cover of dark. Especially considering this part of Iraq isn't exactly soldier friendly. (As if any part is. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon9.gif ) Allowing them to get away could have had more serious implications then getting them killed trying to capture them. Geoschmo |
Re: Two down and two to go
And was it necessary to show to the world the reconstitued bodies of the two Hussein brothers? I mean, what's next? Saddam's head on a pike on CNN?
Why isn't people reacting against this? Should this have been the other way around, Iraq would have been nuked by now (ok, it's a little extreme, but you know what I'm talking about). This is truly grotesque. |
Re: Two down and two to go
Quote:
You didn't hear about that? Geoschmo [ July 29, 2003, 13:38: Message edited by: geoschmo ] |
Re: Two down and two to go
yea that was a double edged sword to show the pictures. The US gov did what they had to do.
They released the picutures. Now CNN showing them every 5 minutes... That was CNN not the US Gov |
Re: Two down and two to go
Quote:
Geoschmo |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.