![]() |
Re: Artificial stupidity
Quote:
When there are no enemies in range of their spells, and no buffs are applicable, they go to 'stay behind troops.' Even when that's NOT the order they were given. Quote:
Quote:
As far as the minotaurs vs centaurs thing, look, that's a pointless discussion. You use what you like, I'll use what I like. But I think that IF what you were saying about the Minotaurs, and the entire light infantry line, were true, that would be every bit as close to a 'bug' as the problem with mages I started the thread about. What's the point in having different troop types if the combat engine is so silly that your best tactic is a big pile of one troop type in the centre of the screen? Fortunately the combat engine isn't as bad, in my experience, as you seem to think. It does have some rough spots, some things that could be improved, of course. Quote:
I wouldn't do that, though. I'd spend perhaps 700 on the heavies, the last 300 on the lights, and deploy them to screen or flank. I think I'd win, and again, if I wouldn't, that would seem to be a 'bug' at least by your standards. Quote:
Quote:
They could also be used to 'pull' enemy squads into disadvantageous positions. |
Re: Artificial stupidity
Buying 25-30 minotaurs is just about the biggest waste of gold ever. Also I wonder wat you mean by "cheap support" since 25 - 30 minotaurs are very expensive. Also I assure you, unless you plan on your "cheap support" doing all the gruntwork, 25-30 minotaurs cannot wipe hundreds of troops. Plus at that stage of the game, the centaur's faster movements will prove much more useful at reaching the backline of casters that will wipe your minotaurs easily.
|
Re: Artificial stupidity
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Artificial stupidity
Don't forget the obligatory two or three advance militia as arrow catchers =).
|
Re: Artificial stupidity
Moderators have sent PMs to some of the posters in this thread. It hasn't had enough of an effect. I'm locking this one up.
|
Re: Artificial stupidity
I’d like to make a statement here and I hope everyone is listening. When a moderator asks you to cut out some unacceptable behavior, you cut it out, it’s as simple as that. I don’t care who started it, but a moderator’s intervention should be the end of it.
We’re pretty relaxed around here, I don’t have to step in often and in general I think we have a pretty good community that knows how to act like adults and police their own posts. HOWEVER, I want to be clear here and say that the type of behavior posted in this thread will not be tolerated. Neither will childish behavior like “well he started it!” as an excuse for retaliation or taking an argument to another area of the forums after a thread lock. I will not hesitate to reward childish behavior with childish punishments, such as time outs! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/mad.gif This is probably a good time for everyone to familiarize yourself with the Board Rules again. Consider this your reminder of the rules and a final warning. We’re about to have an increase in traffic and community activity with the much anticipated release of Dominions 3. Lets remember to treat one another with respect so that these forums can be enjoyable for all. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/smile.gif |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.