![]() |
Re: Momentum 2 - Running
a one-turn truce is fine by me.
|
Re: Momentum 2 - Running
I forced hosting and can open my current turn so we're good to go.
|
Re: Momentum 2 - Running
Valerius, glad to hear your problem is resolved.
While SciencePro said that he wants a one turn truce, he didn't act like that. He mind-hunted and killed my harpy that was carrying 19 death gems. So, what are we going to do about that? |
Re: Momentum 2 - Running
anonymous attacks don't count. That could have been anyone...
|
Re: Momentum 2 - Running
Notice, he didnt say, "It wasn't me" hehe.
|
Re: Momentum 2 - Running
Quote:
To admin: Will there be any consequences to Mictlan player for his actions? I'd like to remind that 19 death gems is quite a lot - that's practically a specter. |
Re: Momentum 2 - Running
Quote:
SciencePro, I hope you just misunderstood the context of the situation. If so, then you need to send Pan the 19 D gems and we can move on. |
Re: Momentum 2 - Running
Quote:
I honestly didn't think to check spells when i was revising because i've been told a million times on these forums that anonymous spells don't count towards diplomacy. But if you had a problem with it you always could have just asked me nicely on PM instead of whining about it on the forum thread. 19 D gems sent. And 7 gold for the harpy. And sorry. And merry freaking christmas. |
Re: Momentum 2 - Running
Quote:
Wherever you heard that anonymous spell don't count towards diplomacy, you heard wrong. Each player decides for himself what he will take into account when conducting diplomacy. I can hardly believe that someone will suffer under anonymous rituals and not change his diplomatic stance against a likely suspect. Anyway, this was not about diplomacy, as Valerius stated earlier. My Christmas in not in another two weeks, but thanks anyway. Merry Christmas to you too. |
Re: Momentum 2 - Running
Meh. I dont know about the whole Anon spell thing. If I'm in a game and ive got a truce with someone I may still throw a boat load of spells at them but not physically attack. Of course I would only do that If I didnt particularly care if they tried to retaliate or not.
If I felt I could win regardless then diplomacy be damned I'm going to do what I want, the way I would look at that is "At least I'm not actually taking your provinces when I could be" In that case I'd say if the person I had a truce with really thought it was me casting and they had the balls to counter attack or hit me back with spells then I cant cry about it. But of course thats not exactly the case here. To be honest I havent checked the game thread for a while and I'm too lazy to go back and see what this Technical problem you were having was so I guess maybe my point doesn't apply here. If there is some sort of Technical issue where you for some reason cannot actually attack then its not entirely fair for one person to be able to use spells like that if they other isn't able for some reason. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.