.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Multiplayer and AARs (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=145)
-   -   Momentum 2 - Finished - Psycho/Pan wins! (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=43775)

SciencePro December 22nd, 2009 05:40 PM

Re: Momentum 2 - Running
 
well i guess i never really understood what the point of the truce was anyway, but since valerius asked nicely I don't mind saying yes. But I figured a truce meant a truce just like a NAP is a truce. If you meant something more than that then I'm sorry i didn't understand what you meant so I don't mind sending restitution which i have done.

I do feel that psycho was a bit disrespectful in the way he brought it up but it could have been worse and I guess he may not have meant it that way. So I hope we can just move on.

Psycho December 22nd, 2009 06:14 PM

Re: Momentum 2 - Running
 
Valerius had a corrupt turn and was unable to do anything. He had to take a stale turn. The point was for me not to make any hostile actions towards him as he was unable to do anything to counter them. It wouldn't be fair to make any attacks or cast any rituals for the simple reason that he couldn't do anything.

He asked to extend this truce to me and Mictlan as well, which Mictlan supported. Taking the truce with Mictlan was obviously to my disadvantage, but I had no problem with it. There was no reason to make any diplomatic truce/NAP, the idea was rather that we all have the same possibilities for attacking that Valerius had - that is none.

I suppose the tone with which I brought the issue up was not the nicest, but I was pissed. I kept my part of the deal, but Mictlan didn't keep his, although it was his choice what to do. That's how it appeared, at least.

Valerius December 22nd, 2009 06:30 PM

Re: Momentum 2 - Running
 
I'm glad it was just a misunderstanding. SciencePro, thanks for sending the gems to Psycho.

I should have made it more clear that this wasn't a normal in-game truce but a metagame situation. Actually I should have just let everyone proceed as-is and taken my stale and thereby avoided all this trouble. :doh: SciencePro, I thought I was actually helping you by including you in the cease fire. Even though I was only out of action for one turn it was still one turn where Psycho didn't have to concern himself with me and could direct all his efforts towards you. But as it turned out, my "helpfulness" wasn't that helpful after all. :)

Valerius December 23rd, 2009 08:50 PM

Re: Momentum 2 - Running
 
Close call: I forgot when the hosting time was and almost staled again. I've postponed hosting by a few hours so I can complete the turn.

After this turn hosts I will postpone the next hosting by several days as per SciencePro's request.

Valerius December 24th, 2009 03:49 PM

Re: Momentum 2 - Running
 
Ok, hosting for the next turn has been postponed until 10:30 GMT on Tuesday.

Psycho December 24th, 2009 07:30 PM

Re: Momentum 2 - Running
 
Thanks a bunch Psi :hurt:

Psycho December 28th, 2009 09:52 PM

Re: Momentum 2 - Running
 
Please extend turn by another 24h.

We should also have a longer turn over new year holidays.

Valerius December 28th, 2009 10:09 PM

Re: Momentum 2 - Running
 
I think SciencePro may have mentioned in another thread that he won't be back until the 30th so I went ahead and postponed hosting by 48 hours. So it looks like we'll host once this week, then a delay for New Year's and then get back on track next week.

SciencePro December 29th, 2009 07:01 PM

Re: Momentum 2 - Running
 
I just got back in town. All my little dwarves are pretty hung-over from their insane dwarven holiday parties, but they persevere nonetheless.

Valerius December 29th, 2009 08:44 PM

Re: Momentum 2 - Running
 
I'm thinking this comment was directed at the Dramatica game? :)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.