Re: OT: Recommendations?
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Amen. (edit: deleted rant)

[ March 10, 2004, 15:11: Message edited by: Tricon ]

Re: OT: Recommendations?
 

I agree completely, Arryn.

They've already soiled the good name of Fallout with the "Brotherhood of Steel" console hackfest. Personally, my feeling is that Interplay is no longer a company to be trusted.

OK, all this (previous) conversation about EU2/HoI/Victoria has got me itching to try them. Maybe I'll have to bargain-bin hunt for EU2 this weekend and simply take a chance.

Re: OT: Recommendations?
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Despite my feelings about the lameness of the EU engine AI, I do recommend you get EU2 and HOI. I also recommend that you spend an extra 6 bucks and buy EU1 just for the EU1 manual which has some very interesting historical info in it.

With regards to HOI, my advice is to be sure you play it with the CORE mod. The basic game's AI files, OOBs, and other factors leave much to be desired. The CORE team has put in an enormous amount of effort into making the game more historically accurate, balanced, and tweaking the AI (as much as can be done) to provide some sort of challenge.

IMO, Victoria is still too buggy to be worth buying. It needs at least 1-2 more patches. A good friend of mine plays Vicky every night, has been doing so for months now, and he never has anything good to say about the game. I own the game myself and he keeps reminding me why I shouldn't play it. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif He keeps playing it because he has nothing else to distract him. I've been trying to get him interested in Dom (since my BF won't play me) but he prefers games that have an economy-management aspect to them (like EU/HOI, and Civ, etc.).

Re: OT: Recommendations?
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">I'm not as interested in HoI as I am in the other two, as I tend to shy away from "modern warfare" games unless they're science-fiction. World War II is an interesting period in history, but not one which I personally find very entertaining in games. The one exception to this would be Pod9's oustanding Gear Krieg miniatures wargame/pen-and-paper RPG, as it's much more of a "what-if" scenario with steampowered mecha, etc. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Duly noted; thank you. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif

Re: OT: Recommendations?
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">What happened to Warlords IV? At one time, the game looked so incredible, then all of a sudden, it totally changed....combat was looking like a fantasy type of Total War (just the screenshots...), then one day, it just all...changed....

I bought Gangland Last nite....really like that game....I also got my hands on Warlords 4, BUT, i only bought it cause it also came with Warlords Battlecry II.

Re: OT: Recommendations?
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">I did not address this point, as it was not the main focus of your argument. The focus of your argument was EU2 vs. DOMII, or RTS vs TB, and in that situation time is the real issue.

HOI (or Victoria, for that matter) vs EU2 clearly shows that given enough development time, a better AI on the same game engine can be made [what a surprise], though it has to obey the same timing restrictions as the old AI, for which we are happy as players, but that has nothing whatsoever to do with the RTS-TB comparison and fundamental timing issues.

I fear we are talking past each other, here. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif

Basically, if you stop comparing turn-based and real-time-based strategy game AIs in a "which is better" fashion, I will stop bringing up timing issues. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

[ March 10, 2004, 16:15: Message edited by: Peter Ebbesen ]

Re: OT: Recommendations?
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">I don't know, but it made me sad. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon9.gif

The tactical one-on-one combat system is interesting, but marred in my opinion by the absolutely hideous, cartoony graphics. The map portion of the game and the other artwork looks OK, though...

And it must be said that I am not really a graphics buff, or at least not one who values graphics over gameplay. But...wow. Warlords IV threw out many of the things which made WIII great, and introduced other things which - in my opinion - didn't add a lot of value to the mix. I was really looking forward to it, too. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon9.gif

Re: OT: Recommendations?
 

I am also new to Dom 2 and loving it! The (other) TBS I really love right now is Stardock's Galactic Civilizations. They have been making updates and adding enhancements to the game since it was released. They even have an expansion coming out in the next couple of months. It is purely SP, but the AI is very well done and can offer a challenge. Since they haven't been mentioned, I'd also point you to the first 2 Master of Orion games.

Re: OT: Recommendations?
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Thanks! I used to play MOO2 quite a bit.

Galactic Civilizations sounds interesting...I'll have to search around a bit. Is it shareware or retail?

Re: OT: Recommendations?
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">GalCiv is retail. It's an interesting game, but it's replayability is, IMO, limited, compared to MOO3 or SE4. After a few games, all your games seem to play out pretty much the same. A large part of this problem is the fact that you can only play as humans, unlike MOO3 or SE4 with their great ability to create custom races.