.com.unity Forums - OT: Stop IE

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)

- Space Empires: IV & V (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20)

- - OT: Stop IE (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=26446)

Yep, web content has to be equally accessible to individuals with disabilities. Including blind individuals. It provides the mechanism for these �individuals� to collect civil damages, which is where the legal establishment stepped in. The intent was to improve access; the result has been the skimming of much cash.

Every site has to be completely viewable by adaptive software such as JAWS. It can be a real pain when writing code by hand.

I've been using Firefox for a year or two now, and I'm very happy with it. I haven't had any problems. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/smile.gif

I have been using Firefox for a while now. I can't live without tabs. It's really nice and easy to add-on. The skins are fun to play with also. Pop-ups are rare and I didn't even have to install any add-ons for that! I've had no technical problems from it at all which is rare for my hodge-podge PC. I don't hate IE, I just love Firefox. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/cool.gif

[EDIT] I just ran my website through the validator. It was full of errors! I had no idea! It's true about Frontpage. Unfortunatly I am horrible at manual HTML coding. Is there a better program for creating websites that won't have so many errors? I want to make sure my site is bug-free.

I am now a convert to teh cause of Firefox. This program is awesome!

Bah, all this talk of IE v. Firefox et. al., it is complete nonsense. There is only one true way to browse the internet, read mail or news, use the shell, or in general, do anything at all. And that way, friends, is EMACS.

http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...es/biggrin.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/cool.gif

Bah.
Get the non-firefox Mozilla instead. It works better.

Evil, evil Will!

Kevin Arisa:

There is Macromedia Dreamweaver... There are programs out there designed to clean up messey code. See Tidy:

http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/

Quote:

Suicide Junkie said:
Bah.
Get the non-firefox Mozilla instead. It works better.

In what way?

Quote:

Thermodyne said:
Yep, web content has to be equally accessible to individuals with disabilities. Including blind individuals. It provides the mechanism for these �individuals� to collect civil damages, which is where the legal establishment stepped in. The intent was to improve access; the result has been the skimming of much cash.

Every site has to be completely viewable by adaptive software such as JAWS. It can be a real pain when writing code by hand.

I hadn't heard if this before. Could you post a link to a reference? I googled the topic, but the most recent source that I found (2002) said that the "Americans with Disabilities Act" doesn't apply to web pages: http://news.com.com/2100-1023-962761.html

Quote:

Spoo said:

Quote:

Suicide Junkie said:
Bah.
Get the non-firefox Mozilla instead. It works better.

In what way?

Well, let's put it this way.

I've heard of plenty of people having trouble with Fireweasel crashing, losing profile data such as bookmarks etc., and various other problems.

I have never experienced these problems, never once lost any bookmarks, very rarely experienced a crash. I'm using Mozilla.

Even when I was using the pre-release 0.x versions of Firefox--I started at 0.5 and worked up to 0.8--I did not experience anything more major than some crashes (lockup), which I later attributed to an incompatability between Gecko (the rendering engine for all Mozilla browsers) and my video card at the time.

Firefox 0.5, btw, was much faster than Mozilla, so there was a reason for its existence. Firefox is now no faster than its more mature brother lizard. But if you want speed, try the 1.8 beta of Mozilla--it screams. Try K-Meleon. It screams louder.

Quote:

Spoo said:

I hadn't heard if this before. Could you post a link to a reference? I googled the topic, but the most recent source that I found (2002) said that the "Americans with Disabilities Act" doesn't apply to web pages: http://news.com.com/2100-1023-962761.html

Here is the part that impacts the web. The key words that allows the rule to be applied to every website "or used by federal agencies", have been much abused. I have seen a case where a private site was linked to by a federal worker in an email to a client. The client took exception and filed a complaint. The site owner was found lible.

Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act requires that all "electronic and information technology" (EIT) developed, procured, maintained, or used by federal agencies must be equally accessible to persons with disabilities as it is to those who are not disabled. The statute and the implementing standards help to create an accessible workplace for federal employees with disabilities. When EIT conforms with the requirements of section 508, people who are blind or visually impaired are able to access and use government information and services as independently and effectively as those who are sighted. Through the use of technology, filling out an electronic form, keeping a copy of the form, or accessing information describing a federal program is as accessible for persons with disabilities as it is for those without disabilities. People who are blind or visually impaired can locate, identify and operate the controls, and functions of any information technology used to provide government information, whether it is on the web, or in a kiosk.