![]() |
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
He still looks tiny which was my point. The problem with Hollywood Urban legends is that they're rarely as strange as truth.
After Terminator came out if you said Arnie will be "The Governator" or he's only 5ft everyone would have gone for the short option. |
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
His ego is definitely taller on Opra's couch.
|
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
"Camera angle" is everything in hollywood. If your short then your in front and the camera is below your shoulders AND wolla! YOUR BIG! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/shock.gif Arnold and Sly are around 5'9" - 5'7" and are always shot from a lower angle to make them appear larger then life! John Wayne always rode a smaller horse to make him appear larger then he was. Hollywood, where anything is possible, even Galaxy's far, far away.
|
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
Quote:
|
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
Yep, Sly isn't a tall man. If you ever saw pictures of him with Bridget Nielsen you can see it. If you think about it everybody in the Rocky movies, Carl weathers, Mr. T., Micky, was a little on the short side so he didn't seem too short by comparison. Then in Rocky 4 when they brought our Dolph Lundgren he looked like a giant, but he was only 6'5" or so. But next to Sly he looked 8 feet tall. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif
John Wayne was one of the tallest actors in Hollywood though at the time he was working. He was 6'4". Not saying they didn't put him on a small horse to make him look even bigger though. Course it might have been just so they could keep him in the frame with the other actors. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/laugh.gif |
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
Ahem...
Hollywood be darned; who do ya think should play Honor? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif |
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
Sylvester Stallone is 5'10"
|
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
Quote:
* Is there any reason why even derivative sequels _have_ to be so badly made, either for games or for films? Surely with the huge budgets invested, someone could invest some more taste, talent, or other qualities? Do the _have_ to be so bad to make money? Wouldn't they make more money if they were better derivative sequels than they generally are? * Just because some crappy business practice makes money, doesn't mean I or you or anyone _has_ to care, purchase, or pay any attention to the crappy products. For example, we're still here playing Space Empires IV, a _good_ sequel, and I never even bothered with MOO3, a crappy sequel, or most other low-gameplay megacorp releases, or most Hollywood (i.e. crappy) films. * By paying for, paying attention to, and mentioning acceptance of such crappy practices, one becomes part of the problem. PvK |
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
PvK has a point. And also, you're more likely to keep your audience and possibly grow it by making a respectable series of movies. Sort of like star wars, only not overbearingly shiney to the point of sacraficing content. Sort of like Harry Potter who, despite my own reservations, is a pretty good example of how to continue a sustainable movie franchise.
|
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
Yah know who would make a good Honor Harrington http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif
http://www.perfectpeople.net/picpage.php3/cpid=83531 Awwwww China http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif Seriously from what I've seen she's an okay actress and she's fairly tall AND she fits the "good looking Asian/Caucasian" mix that HH would require http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.