![]() |
Re: What Is More Important To You?
There was no reason for an SE-style game to be 3D, none at all.
A First Person Shooter has to be 3D, and that's where 3D belongs. That old game, are you guys talking "Carriers at War"? I had that for my Apple IIc, and it rocked, no doubt. Even on a monochrome monitor http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif Oh, and as far as graphics vs gameplay, welll..... I'll take a game with boobies over no boobies any day http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif |
Re: What Is More Important To You?
No fair using the trump card! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...ies/tongue.gif
Actually Ascendency had a true-3d system map, which was a decent reason to have 3D. And SEV has far more on screen at once in '3d' mode than it would in 2d (switch to top-down mode and note how much farther you have to zoom out to see all the hexes). |
Re: What Is More Important To You?
Quote:
|
Re: What Is More Important To You?
Quote:
One of the best games I ever played is North Atlantic '86. It was a text game that actually made you feel like you were sitting in a war room someplace. |
Re: What Is More Important To You?
I still play Pacific War, a game that came out in 1990. Back then it had many bugs but after a considerable amount of patches it turned into a little gem.The graphics are not great but the level of detail is immense.
|
Re: What Is More Important To You?
Huh, I played the AH board game called Midway, and it was great good fun. But I don't recall a computer game by AH...
|
Re: What Is More Important To You?
id taken gameplay over this 3d stuff.
Sadly even EU3 is going the way of 3d =( I hope it does better than this. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.