![]() |
Re: Most powerful nation
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Also all your troops are sacred and with Mandahas you get H3 mages to bless them. A Rakshasa Warrior for 5 slaves is an good unit to make the mand fightingpower of your armies, if your enemy does not have enough archers Asrapas for 2 slaves can be very effective. You have also stealthy sacreds (Sandhyabalas) and stealthy priests (Manushya Rakshasi). Also as you can summon almost everything you need, it should be possible to bloodhunt in every province you own, maybe with the exception of the capitol and some plains to pay the upkeep for your bloodhunters and to recruit new Raksharajas. I think i will try to get them for evermore. |
Re: Most powerful nation
I wouldn't neglect the fact that your recruitable sacreds are actually pretty badass, in my opinion even the build everywhere Kala Mukha warriors are solid sacreds.
I was always of the opinion that strong blood (which they certainly have - top 3 for sure) made for a great mid and late game, not a strong early game. You also have highly cost effective researchers, can go into death nature and air without a real problem and don't have the drawbacks of EA and LA Mictlan. Obviously K has a lot more experience with them than me, but I can't really agree with him. |
Re: Most powerful nation
I agree with Sombre on the KM, but I don't see the point of recruiting demon sacred, as they are banishable. It's true that with a double ubber bless W/F and there good strength, they can do miracles.
|
Re: Most powerful nation
FWIW, I would really consider LA Mictlan more of a EA nation stuck in the late era, I'd count my survival in Perpetually in the EA column. Capital only real mages, low resource/protection toops, strong sacreds...
|
Re: Most powerful nation
Quote:
Ahmm, I wasn't eliminated as Lanka, I was watching this happen as the neighboring Abysia http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif And its very likely that player did take double bless. |
Re: Most powerful nation
Removed.
|
Re: Most powerful nation
Quote:
My comment was more strongly pointed at Hydras (oops - dead poisoned army) and communions (exploding armies, over fatigued slaves dying in droves) Angels can't backfire of course but used wrongly they will be counter productive. This is a general statement that's true for most summons. Some examples that do come to mind are using Seraphs against rival astral nation and sub par usage of harbringers (which can be awesome in some situations and pathetic in others). |
Re: Most powerful nation
Blood doesn't require a castle, lab, or temple. Just a blood hunter and a pair of scouts, preferably in a low income province. At most one would need a castle and lab. A temple is entirely unnecessary.
|
Re: Most powerful nation
K,
One point I have to disagree on is demons. Demons are one of the reasons I had the trouble with you that I did. Immune to disease. That offsets banish. Banish does not work well with Lanka's sacreds that have 30 hps and regeneration(even with h3 priests). The only way i managed to kill those capital only sacreds is with banelords that had 70 gems worth of items. And as you pointed out in another thread, they were easy to banish to the inferno or kill outright with life for a life. One advantage of Lanka is it does not need thugs. It own troops are thugs and its national summons are sc's. |
Re: Most powerful nation
Removed.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.