Resources
 

For me the problem would be solved by rasing the castle resource bonus from 25% to say 75%.

My complaint is not the MR or the slowness, I see that as central to the theme. My problem is I cannot crank out enough troops to keep up early game.

Should be pretty easy to mod, I might do that.

Re: Resources
 

Oh... and before I forget...

While Arbalests open Ulm up to friendly fire, I'm not aware of the game taking any special considerations into account. That is, Tower Shields should be just as effective against friendly fire as hostile fire, with maybe only an 3% hit rate at the outset, climbing as high as 14% with 99 fatigue. If you recruit shielded infantry, you shouldn't really need worry about friendly fire so much as wasted ammo.

Re: Frostmorne27
 

You know it's sort of like putting a band aid on a festering axe wound, but Ulm could simply have their resource bonus in forts increased. It's currently 25% I believe. If it was 50% they would at least be able to produce their troops in bulk and some people might be tempted away from prod 3.

Re: Frostmorne27
 

Hey I just said that! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/laugh.gif

Re: Frostmorne27
 

Yeah, sorry, I didn't see :]

It's very easy to mod, if anyone wanted to test it out.

You just need to #selectnation (MA Ulm's number) then #castleprod 50 or 75 or whatever. Then #end :]


Just as a sidenote: Arbalests aren't the best missile weapons in the game. They're worse than crossbows imo. And Ulm's arbalests cost a load of resources, making them far harder to mass than say Marig's crossbows.

Re: Frostmorne27
 

the only bad thing about cranking 300 Ulm Infantry and an army of Black knights. Then a mage teleports in with a runesmasher, eye void, spell focus and casts master enslave and that person owns your army.

Yeah you can cast tempering the will if you have the luxury of going to thau. 5. That raises the mr from 9 to? I had commanders with 24 mr get enslaved in alpaca. heh. what chance does mr 9 have?

Of course you may get your commanders mind hunted, and be stuck with no one to cast tempering the will. Then it is pretty much automatic enslavement.

Maybe master enslave needs toned down a bit. But that is for a different thread. It is potent now though, and Ulm is last in being able to defend against it.

Re: Xietor
 

Well, none really... but Master Enslave is a Thuamaturgy 9 spell, requiring an S8 mage, something thats not necessarily common. It's not the worlds fairest comparison. Tempering of the Will can be helpful against plenty of other spells, though.

620 RP versus 4600 on standard... That's CORRECTION: 1/7th of the effort required. If you're not facing anything that require you to boost your resistance earlier than that, then you're quite lucky. You'll have better odds than many 10 or 11 MR nations....

Regards to mind hunt, you've still got the not-quite effective enough lead shields. Though your Master Smiths will have a decent chance of surviving, the cost of mind hunt is obscenely low.

Even if you can't wipe them out, it may be worth finding the time to kill a level 8/9 astral pretender early, a couple of times. It'll stop wishery.

Re: Xietor
 

This will probably come as a surprise for most people but IMO MA Ulm isn't as terrible as it's made out to be. I think most people are either feeling the after effects of Dom II (where they are the worst nation) or the CB where Earth boots got bumped in cost and blade wind nerfed. In base, MA TC and MA Argatha are both in a worse off position (just going off the top of my head) with MA Oceania not doing too great either. Ulm troops are decent if you spread them out to avoid them clustering (and as a result eating up) too many magic attacks. Their mages, while unversatile, are actually decent in battle between earth buffs, decent prot, blade wind + magna spells. Arbalests are crappy but sappers are actually usable for their bonus + xbows. Drain 1 isn't too terrible compared to magic 3 in base if you're relying on indie mage research and drain 3 is just free points if you're planning on ending the game pre turn 50.

Re: Xietor
 

I disagree about MA Agartha. Certainly it isn't the strongest position early on, and the lack of crossbows can be comically painful - but in terms of combat magic, a golem crafter is just like a master smith except that he also has a water. We can have theoretical arguments all day - but the fact is, I've seen MA Agartha have a lot more success in a significant number of games, such that I doubt it's a fluke.

I agree about MA T'ien Ch'i - but MA T'ien Ch'i is very different from Ulm, and a fix is in the works from the devs.

Re: MA Agartha and MA Ulm
 

I concur with Doctor Praetorius about MA Agartha compared to MA Ulm. MA Agartha is far from the strongest, and has some glaring weaknesses, but is functionally better than MA Ulm is. The infantry is somewhat similar, if lacking solid weaponry, but is less easily exhausted, has at least average MR, and has darkvision. MA Agartha's mages and priests are more diverse and they have some solid national summons as well. MA Agartha's golem cult effect can make a large difference for not only it's national statues, but for other construction summons as well. In Chinchilla, in which I am MA Agartha, I repeatedly beat MA Tien Chi's arrow swarms between my infantry's shields, and my statues' high protection and hit points to the point where he called off the war. I would of course still rank MA Agartha as not the best out there, but certainly a better performer than MA Ulm.

I've always liked MA Ulm's idea, but in practice they have so many problems. Slow and heavy infantry with bad MR get eaten alive by battlefield magic before they can even close the gap. As MA R'Lyeh fighting them for an example, I have my artillery brigades of ilithids mind blast away while my infantry blocks hold and attack and am often able to force Ulm to rout before they ever get to melee. The Arbalests fire so slowly and from such extreme range (and I usually split my ilithid groups into fire closest and fire archers as well), that they have little to no effect on even my poorly armored lobo guard chaff. I would like to see exactly what Dr. Praetorius was asking for: force the enemy, somehow, to meet Ulm on Ulm's terms.

On a related note, I was under the impression that shields did not help troops from friendly fire since the shields are in front and the projectiles hit you in the back and thusly provided no bonus against them. Is this not the case?