Re: Modding multiple shipyards per planet?
 

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Of course, you'd have to add a special "Temporal Spaceyard Expansion" since Temporal space yards are a different family number than standard space yards (which means you can't upgrade a standard yard to a Temporal yard - a HUGE pain when you play low tech start and have to replace all those old yards later in the game...)

Re: Modding multiple shipyards per planet?
 

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">But actually you wouldn't need to upgrade to a temporal yard. You could build a SYE and upgrade to a standard space yard. You'd have one temporal yard and as many standard space yards as you wanted or could fit. I guess proporionally it would lessen the advantage of the temporal player, but it wouldn't eliminate it completely. But allowing him to build multiple temporal yards would multiply the advantage. Needs to be a middle ground somehwere I think.

Geo

Re: Modding multiple shipyards per planet?
 

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That's why I've made the Temporal Space Yard the same family as regular Space Yards. The AI will NEVER change the old space yards on planets where they were built before the TSY was discovered if you don't do that.

I'm tempted to reduce planet and facility space yards capacity and use population bonuses to increase production. This makes more sense to my mind.

But that leaves space yard bases hanging since population has no effect on them. I wish there was a 'fourth resource' -- call it 'labor' since 'man hours' doesn't work for aliens. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif If population produced 'labor' and components needed 'labor' as well as the three resources we could balance production much more realistcally.

[ June 26, 2002, 22:20: Message edited by: Baron Munchausen ]

Re: Modding multiple shipyards per planet?
 

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That is such a great idea! ("Conquest of the New World" has that feature, BTW.) But you couldn't have any Labor Storage facilities. (Except maybe Temporal!) Wouldn't it be fun demanding Labor from your beaten adversary?

Also, population should use up Organics every turn. If you ran out of Organics, people should starve.

And since I'm suggesting: A planet that is blockaded can't contribute anything to your economy. Makes sense. So, why can a blockaded planet with no mineral mines or storage still produce stuff? A blockaded tiny domed planet with only a SY shouldn't be able to emergency-build defenses out of nothing.

As a corollary, a blockaded planet with no Organics should slowly starve to death. (Although they should riot/surrender before that happens.) This is a huge facet of warfare that is totally ignored by SEIV. If you have the naval power to blockade with impunity, you should be able to take a planet by siege without invading, unless it has been designed to be self-sufficient. Before they surrender though, they would scrap other facilities to build Farms. But then what if the planet has lousy Organic value? Imagine the poor starving slobs pulling apart their Rad Extractors for Minerals to build a Farm, only to realize that they need 10 Farms just to feed themselves on such a barren rock!

And you'd have to add another ship order, "Run Blockade," so supply ships could keep the blockaded planet going.

In fairness to the planets, though, perhaps ships should also have to carry Organics for the crew. Or maybe the supplies can be converted freely into food? (In which case, ships would use small amounts of supplies just sitting there.) But then in fairness, planets should be able to do the same sort of supply conVersion thing. Hmmm ... come to think of it, ships and planets in SEIV use totally different resource systems, with the ship system being quite simplistic.

Re: Modding multiple shipyards per planet?
 

Yes, there are many many many possible non-combat enhancements to the game that are being neglected. I guess the idea of 'conflict' is uppermost in the minds of most game developers as a way to make the game interesting. I prefer solving puzzles. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif

More infrastructure features would be a great way to make the game more interesting. Populations should need a some organics to maintain themselves. Facilities should need a certain amount of population to operate. (This was added during development but deactivated. Dang it... why can't it be an option like so many other things?) If 'labor' were a non-portal resource then you'd be forced to locate your major shipyards at large population centers. Hey, presto, more realism! None of these would require 'micro-management' at the level of moving resources around in individual ships. It's all doable with game mechanics about as complex as we currently have in SE IV.

There should be more factors in planetary environment, too. Stars! had it right. Gravity, Temperature range, Radiation. Add those three to the current atmospheres and we've got a pretty decent set of simulated environment variables. Add techs to compensate them for your populations and the game gets much more interesting.

As far as ships and crews, I think tracking individual ships' supplies is good enough. We just need a 'default' supply usage rate so they can't sit on station forever. If the game would read and use the supply usage on components like Crew Quarters and Life Support each turn this would be doable.

[ June 27, 2002, 00:39: Message edited by: Baron Munchausen ]

Re: Modding multiple shipyards per planet?
 

Hi all !!

Thanks for your Last answers !!
PDF si tu es ok j aimerais bien avoir ce facility.txt.

For the Last ideas,there are very very good...and i will be the first happy player !!!

Re: Modding multiple shipyards per planet?
 

Heh, this is the first time I've ever seen slang used in French. (I've never been to French-speaking cities or areas... every single bit of French I've heard has been the pure-grammar Version, and only in school.)


(C'est amusant, en verité... je ne sais pas si ma grammaire est mal ou bon. Après ma repére, j'ai perdu plus ou moins de 65% que mon enseignant de français m'a enseigné. Aussi, je suis un Canadien -- la français du Canada est un peu differente. Pour exemple, "le dîner" contre "la souper". ;-) )


Erp, I can't think of a way to get back on topic here.

...Oh well. =)

Re: Modding multiple shipyards per planet?
 

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">P&N does this, and I'm sure proportions has something to that effect as well.

In the latest P&Ns (2.5 PBW), spaceyard rate is set to 10% for 1M people, and goes up 1% for every 25M people after that.
Effectively, Homeworlds start with about 175% of normal build rate, but colonies of 100M are stuck with 14%, and struggle to build even the cheapest facilities, normally taking 6 months to a year each.
At the other end of the scale, Sphereworlds get about 25x more build rate than normal http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif
Besides the fact that it would take forever to build the spaceyard on a colony, you'd get little return on your investment.

Re: Modding multiple shipyards per planet?
 

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">P&N does this, and I'm sure proportions has something to that effect as well.

In the latest P&Ns (2.5 PBW), spaceyard rate is set to 10% for 1M people, and goes up 1% for every 25M people after that.
Effectively, Homeworlds start with about 175% of normal build rate, but colonies of 100M are stuck with 14%, and struggle to build even the cheapest facilities, normally taking 6 months to a year each.
At the other end of the scale, Sphereworlds get about 25x more build rate than normal http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif
Besides the fact that it would take forever to build the spaceyard on a colony, you'd get little return on your investment.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That's not quite what I meant but it's true that population production bonuses come close to this effect. But what I intnded was that even orbital space yards should be dependent on population.

Basically, population would 'produce' a resource called 'labor' and it would then be used to: 1) operate facilities, 2) build stuff. Each facility could then have a 'labor input' requirement to be operated. And spaceyard bases built around planets with high population would be vastly more productive. Oh, and robotoid factories would then boost your 'labor' production per population point, not your production directly. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif

After the balancing effects of making population more valuable, and making facilities usage more realistic, the main advantage of this system would be similar to the 'maintenance modifier' that was discussed in another thread. You could make something very expensive in 'labor' but not other resources so it was difficult to build but not expensive to maintain.

[ July 03, 2002, 16:13: Message edited by: Baron Munchausen ]

Re: Modding multiple shipyards per planet?
 

What would happen to spaceyards on ships or bases that were not orbiting a planet? Would those build extremely slowly? If not, why not? If so, then won't that make it all but impossible to build a ring/sphere world? (Don't you have to build them in place, using non-orbiting spaceyards, since the components are too big to transport from a planetary shipyard?)