![]() |
Re: OT - Who wants to write a "roguelike" game? How about a 4X?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: OT - Who wants to write a "roguelike" game? How about a 4X?
So someone wants to make a roguelike game eh?
I'm sure that you're gonna want some nifty graphic tiles right? http://pousse.rapiere.free.fr/tome/index.htm You can find all my 'free' tiles here. (you can also find some work screens I posted in the Dungeon Odyssey forum. The screens are full of monster body parts etc so you can have fun creating your own frankenstein works. Cheers! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif |
Re: OT - Who wants to write a "roguelike" game? How about a 4X?
Quote:
I release narf and pat him gently on the head now be a good rat and go play in the sandbox. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/shock.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...s/rolleyes.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif Cheers! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif [ January 28, 2004, 14:30: Message edited by: David E. Gervais ] |
Re: OT - Who wants to write a "roguelike" game? How about a 4X?
MOUSE! i'm a MOUSE!
we do have 'roguelike' games that have graphics. there called >Adventure< or >RPG< games. by saying roguelike, i am refering to a specific type of adventure or rpg game where the graphics are text-based. to call a graphical adventure or rpg a roguelike would reduce the classification to redundancy. so there. *bounces a peice of cheese off David's head.* http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif [ January 28, 2004, 19:43: Message edited by: narf poit chez BOOM ] |
Re: OT - Who wants to write a "roguelike" game? How about a 4X?
Quote:
Narf Have you ever played a game called Angband? Nethack? ToME? All these are considered 'Roguelike' but they also have the option to play with 'graphic' tiles. So according to you these games STOP being a roguelike game when you toggle the graphics on? Bzzzzzzzzz, Wrong! Roguelike is a 'type' of gameplay experience. Not a 'set' of text display routines. by your definition to be roguelike a game needs to be text based. Does this mean the computer Version of 'hangman' that uses a text display is a roguelike? You are mixing apples and oranges, and while apples go good with cheeze, I doubt that oranges are. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif Cheers! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif [ January 28, 2004, 20:17: Message edited by: David E. Gervais ] |
Re: OT - Who wants to write a "roguelike" game? How about a 4X?
Quote:
|
Re: OT - Who wants to write a "roguelike" game? How about a 4X?
Quote:
|
Re: OT - Who wants to write a "roguelike" game? How about a 4X?
Ok, Narf I'll set the record straight and give you a history lesson at the same time..
The origins of Rogue... Michael Toy and Glenn Wichman, two students in University of Santa Cruz, California, experimented with curses library. They both had enjoyed playing Adventure which was the first text adventure game. After making some simple games with curses, they began to write a graphical adventure game. Michael Toy did most of the programming and Glenn contributed ideas to the project and coined the name "Rogue". One of their main goals to create a game they could enjoy playing by themselves. Most existing adventure-type games had predesigned plot and world which remained exactly the same every time you played it. Michael and Glenn decided to make Rogue more random. Rogue build the dungeon using the pseudo-random number generator, so the game was different every time you played it, making it possible that even the creators of the game could be surprised by it. So if you notice the bold text "they began to write a graphical adventure game." you can see that the original rogue was indeed designed to be a 'graphical adventure' the fact that it uses 'curses' instead of bitmaps does not make it 'less-graphical'. They were simply using the tools of the day. (and making very innovative use of the tools too.) What does this mean? It means that the original 'Rogue' was always meant to be a 'graphical' game and therefore all 'Roguelike' games should also be considered 'graphical' and weather they use 'ascii' or 'tiles' , has no bearing on their being roguelike. What makes games roguelike is 'Random' dungeons, treasure, monsters, multiple levels and a hot concept called 'replayability'. Rogue is the 'Grandfather of crpg'. Give Rogue the full credit it is due. Don't just say it's the first text-based crpg, it is so much more than that. I rest my case. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif So what do I win? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif Cheers! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif |
Re: OT - Who wants to write a "roguelike" game? How about a 4X?
fine, so RPG's with random dungeons and stuff can call themselves 'roguelikes'. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif
what do you win? cheese! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif *drops 2 tons of cheese on David* but what do you do when all RPG's have random dungeons, huh? what do you do then? didn't think of that, did you? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif |
Re: OT - Who wants to write a "roguelike" game? How about a 4X?
no, diablo cant call itsself roguelike just because it has random dungeons. and it isnt unroguelike just because it does not use ascii. you can argue any similarity or difference, but the 'heart' of the genre is going to be specific to any individuals interperatation. which is why you both have your undies in a bunch. rogue was ASCII based, and was tile based, was turn based, had random dungeons, involved a quest for artifact retrieval, etc, etc. you can say that the presence or lack of any of those things makes it roguelike or unroguelike, but honestly youre just *****in.
you guys are playing two extremes of the arguement, and i must insist that you quit yer *****in. there are many tilesets for rogue, and the Version that I played the most of, was written by one of the original two designers as an ATARI ST port, and indeed used a graphical tileset. the same tileset that is still popular, and which is used to derive many of the larger tilesets in existance today. there are many efforts at creating 3d isometric tilesets, and some open GL ones. my favorite way to play is with the classic ascii characters, but if there was a well done graphical set, with animated tiles, i'd play that too. Honestly, the Version that I find most attractive is the set that uses OPEN-GL rendered ascii characters, so the floor is a bunch of flat '.' characters, and the '@' sign and other symbols stand up in 3d. I have often wanted to take some custom art to a print shop to be placed on a t-shirt, with a 3-d @ symbol wielding a shield and flaming sword, with a limp & sign on the ground before it. As an interesting note (that most folks are unaware of, so i thought i'd share), the original default character name for the ST port of Rogue (by one of the original designers, as i mentioned) was Rodney. You were, of course, trying to recover the Amulet of Yendor. In Nethack, you are also trying to recover the Amulet of Yendor. But its a bit more detailed, and you have to take it from a near-demigod wizard (the wizard of yendor). His name? Rodney. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.