Re: SCs other than the vq
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">However, all you have to do is strike at an Ermorian castle with sufficient force to begin damaging the gates. Cast Crumble, and you'll have an instant breach, if you felt your regular army was not enough to breach.

</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">I was under this distinct impression that the castle destroying/rebuilding spells were not working properly,... is this old data, or am I more generally confused?

I'm not sure, btw, that an naked immortal (i.e.risk free) pretender design that requires multiple simultaneous successful castle assaults to counter is ... quite balanced. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...s/confused.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/shock.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...s/confused.gif

Shall I repost the note I left in the other thread detailing the absurdity of your defense of the VQ castling strat, ...

http://www.shrapnelgames.com/cgi-bin...583;p=1#000050

or can we just concede the extremity of the situation is broken and needs to be looked at... with care that immortality isn't abusable in a different chassis.

Rabe

Re: SCs other than the vq
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">I've only played with him once and I never needed to conquer his castles. When I was around to play with him the few times I had time he was still clutching to his 'only World Map' preference.

Re: SCs other than the vq
 

my only point about K.O. not knowing about it, is that this issue could not have been too pressing for the beta-testers, if they were even testing this strat.

Really, Norfleet is the best one to demonstrate its power. I suggest that concerned parties inquire of Graeme about how it works, and how "easy" it is to counter. I know Truper was unable to. I can do fight it, but only because all my nation designs are made w/ that in mind. I think I've only heard of Norf losing one game, and he wasn't playing Ermor in that.

Re: SCs other than the vq
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Maybe you should try them before you talk. Castling every province has been around before Norfleet beat you with it. But maybe casual rejection of ideas is why you don't think them useful. </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">lol more insults. I guess that stands in for actual experience. When I was a complete noob I was up against norfleet. All you gave me then were insults as well.

now, of course, a group of skilled players could implicitly begin a game w/ an anti-norfleet alliance, and should be able to easily bring him down. That's not really indicative of balance.

[ May 04, 2004, 22:38: Message edited by: archaeolept ]

Re: SCs other than the vq
 

How about this. Ban VQ's for another month and have Norfleet play Ermor with just a different pretender. You don't change any of your strategies or try anything new, and if he suddenly loses a disproportionate amount of his games, then you can say with every validity that it's the VQ that is the determining factor.

Re: SCs other than the vq
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Maybe if you could site another player who has done it every time and won every time, I would have a better time seeing your point of view. But since it is the same person every time and I haven't heard "I play exactly like Norfleet and I win every game I play" I think there is something missing as far as your experience.

Re: SCs other than the vq
 

the combined strat is broken. r'lyeh works very well even though it doesn't have access to the VQ (the GK instead) because it is so nicely defensible and capable of getting the clam strat up and running.

however, that was before the paralysis bug was fixed, so I'm not sure norfleet would want to play them now.

And norfleet certainly can win w/ other pretenders. he knows a lot of tricks and a lot about the game - ie. he would be very good even if he did not use these abuses.

As such, that he would still win doesn't logically imply that the VQ isn't broken... <font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">please. name me a good player who has managed to deal w/ his strat and does not think it is broken. just one.

[ May 04, 2004, 22:44: Message edited by: archaeolept ]

Re: SCs other than the vq
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Are you challenging me? I'll still play them. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Ignoring the loaded term of "abuses", which cannot be proven, I've won games where I have not had the option of, or deliberately chose not to use, a VQ.

Admittedly, I *DO* have a certain stylistic preference that the VQ fits well into, but it is because of the fit that I choose it, not the other way around, and it is not the only shoe that fits: My preferences were that way well before Dom2 existed. However, if shoe fits, wear it.

[ May 04, 2004, 22:48: Message edited by: Norfleet ]

Re: SCs other than the vq
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">lol

like I said, you'ld still do well, and be a ***** to beat. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif

However, if we Banned clams and only allowed you castles in half your territories...

http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif

Re: SCs other than the vq
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Oh, so he is a good player and has won with other pretenders? I thought he only used the same thing every time, that was your point I believe.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Nice CYA there. No it does not mean they are not broken, but it puts the bias on the skill of the player and not the use of the VQ. All it says is that a good player can win consistantly without using only one design. If he were to do so, I think you'd see alot less of an uproar about it and it wouldn't be so pronounced for those who play him time and time again facing the exact same strategy/pretender.

I believe it's been said before and I'll say it again, as if people suddenly forget. The VQ might need to be adjusted in cost/nations, if only to limit the popularity not the potency of the VQ. Anything a VQ can do, any other pretender with the exception of the physically weak ones, can as well. So if they can do the exact same thing under the same circumstances, why is the VQ singled out? Because it's easier?

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Graeme. He may personally feel that it should be adjusted, but broken? He'll have to answer that for himself. Earlier in this thread he mentioned he almost won with Vanheim except for the bad luck of his AF casting Shockwave. If he was previously unable to handle it and is now progressing to the point he could, it means to me he is strategizing his way to beat Norfleet's finely honed strategy.

[ May 04, 2004, 22:54: Message edited by: Zen ]