![]() |
Re: OT: Windows Optimization?
tasks-0.92b, shortcut2-2.0.2 and hotkey-2.0 are apparently the ones that are lacking. I'll try popping things into theme.rc and see what happens...
|
Re: OT: Windows Optimization?
Looks like it might be a problem with naming... ie, tasks-0.92b.dll might need to be something along the lines of tasks-0.9.dll, or vice versa. Might want to check that the file names already existing in theme.rc (do a quick Ctrl-F on tasks, shortcut, hotkey, respectively) and see that the names in there match the actual file names of the *.dlls you have installed. If they're different, you probably want to rename the files, since there is a possibility the filename is referenced somewhere else, and you don't want to track down that entry in all the config files http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif
|
Re: OT: Windows Optimization?
Quote:
That does not make one ounce of sense... |
Re: OT: Windows Optimization?
You can run DOS inside Windows without 3rd party tools, hence DOS is windows-compatible OS http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...ies/tongue.gif
|
Re: OT: Windows Optimization?
/me whapeth Aiken. Not entirely sure why, but sure there is a good reason.
|
Re: OT: Windows Optimization?
Quote:
Does anyone know if there's a 3rd party program that can do what explorer.exe does in terms of navigating the file system, without acutually using explorer.exe. Please let me know & then I can finally be (more or less) free of the MicroSoft yoke. |
Re: OT: Windows Optimization?
There are several out there. One is Total Commander, though I personally do not like it... Google for alternate file managers.
|
Re: OT: Windows Optimization?
Total Commander (shareware) - mega file manager, dual pane.
Servant Salamander (free and shareware) - so-so, dual pane. FAR (OSS, free) - powerful FM without graphic gui for CLI lovers, dual pane. Xplorer2 - (shareware) - very good and lightweight FM, dual pane, single pane(explorerish). Directory Opus (shareware) - very good but heavy (in terms of RAM usage) FM, dual pane, single pane(explorerish). |
Re: OT: Windows Optimization?
Cool, thanks. I had a couple good days (literally 2) with LiteStep, but now it's behaving poorly as well. We've got a couple Pentium/233MHz's at work and they run WinNT faster than my 2.4GHz at the moment and that just ain't right. I'm convinced that my explorer.exe file is corrupted, but I can't even get a reinstall to work. As soon as I get to the part where Windows is supposed to install, it sits there and does nothing, even though the system hasn't locked up or anything. I'm sitting here writing this after the installer has been telling me that installation will take approximately 51 minutes. Problem is it's been saying that for 4 HOURS! I'm at a loss as to what I can do, since I don't seem to be able to boot from my Windows install CD. Any tips? Or if someone has an uncorrupted explorer.exe file, can I have it?
|
Re: OT: Windows Optimization?
Check your BIOS, and make sure that you've got the boot sequence set to a logical order. (Floppy, CD then HDD)
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.