.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Multiplayer & AARs (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=62)
-   -   Clash Of Armies [Started] (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=27572)

castigated February 11th, 2006 06:40 AM

Re: Clash Of Armies
 
f9 jags ftw?

WraithLord February 11th, 2006 08:46 AM

Re: Clash Of Armies
 
Quote:

Peacekeeper said:
ive reconsidered and would like to play ctis if it is still available(i think it is?)

/edit also i added my email to my profile.

I'm sorry but Panther claimed C'tis before you.

WraithLord February 11th, 2006 08:51 AM

Re: Clash Of Armies
 
Quote:

Wish_For_Blood_Slaves said:
actually after playing around with the settings, I think I'm going to sit this one out.

May I ask why? Is it because the settings are not to your liking?

WraithLord February 11th, 2006 09:15 AM

Re: Clash Of Armies
 
Quote:

The Panther said:
Oh, and one other thing. You need a victory condition of some sort.

I agree. Do you think that 150 provinces is a good VC?

If anyone has a good suggestion for VC please feel free to post it.

The Panther February 11th, 2006 01:06 PM

Re: Clash Of Armies
 
Quote:

Folket said:
I will still play mictlan, even though I'm not allowed to blood hunt.

You really cannot play Mictlan. You MUST have blood slaves to sacrifice in order to spread your dominion. With only the starting 3 slaves from your capitol to sacrifice, you will lose quickly to lack of dominion. The map is big enough that it may take 40-50 turns for this to happen, but it is inevitable.

Even Abysia is not as bad as Mictlan under a blood hunting ban.

The Panther February 11th, 2006 01:12 PM

Re: Clash Of Armies
 
Quote:

WraithLord said:
Quote:

The Panther said:
Oh, and one other thing. You need a victory condition of some sort.

I agree. Do you think that 150 provinces is a good VC?

If anyone has a good suggestion for VC please feel free to post it.

Provinces is great! But 150 seems high. If a player has this many provinces, then:
1. He has intense micromanagement pain.
2. He had it won already long ago!

However, on such a large map, that is probably only a little bit high.

Wish February 11th, 2006 01:20 PM

Re: Clash Of Armies
 
I just played around with some test ideas, and I wasn't enjoying it

RonD February 11th, 2006 02:04 PM

Re: Clash Of Armies
 
I'm sure we could accomodate Mictlan and stay within the spirit of the rules. For that nation, we simply outlaw blood research and the forging of items that require slaves.

WraithLord February 11th, 2006 02:30 PM

Re: Clash Of Armies
 
Quote:

The Panther said:
Provinces is great! But 150 seems high. If a player has this many provinces, then:
1. He has intense micromanagement pain.
2. He had it won already long ago!

However, on such a large map, that is probably only a little bit high.

Half the map than, 130 provinces.

Quote:

I'm sure we could accomodate Mictlan and stay within the spirit of the rules. For that nation, we simply outlaw blood research and the forging of items that require slaves.

Makes sense. This can work for the other nations as well.

Cainehill February 11th, 2006 02:31 PM

Re: Clash Of Armies
 
Better to just ban blood, and leave Mictlan out, simpler that way. Then, anyone gets a blood item (random event giving blood stone, lifelong protection, devil contract, etc) they contact the guy with the master password, so _that_ person knows they have it, and didn't break the rules.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.