![]() |
Re: High PD kinda useless.
We could write a song around that.
You say NERFED I say BALANCED If we collect a bunch of those and match them up in rhymed pairs it would probably sing very well. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif |
Re: High PD kinda useless.
Gandalf are you high/drunk/more mentally 'unique' than usual?
|
Re: High PD kinda useless.
Lack of sleep. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif
My son is having bad nights. |
Re: High PD kinda useless.
Quote:
I want to see a battle with those 2 units. |
Re: High PD kinda useless.
I think it is great at choke points. You shove it up to 40 and you have top level infantry. If you back them with a good archer squad they become hard to beat.
I had a 194 man force in a 40 PD provine and was hit by almost 400 troops. They lost 176 to my 1 man. Yes, I was using flaming arrows and had 100 longbowmen. All my infantry was set on guard commander and the enemy troops never made it to my troops. I was planning to make them pay for that choke point and never thought I could win. Over 1000 troops and two Gods died trying to take that province. I held with minimal reinforcements and just a three or four spell casters. That 40 PD was the best spent money of the game. |
Re: High PD kinda useless.
Quote:
|
Re: High PD kinda useless.
Immobile troops but without upkeep. Even at twice the price if you have to defend the province turn after turn and if you succeed a sufficient time it's not a bad investment.
|
Re: High PD kinda useless.
Quote:
The units from province defense don't need food supplies, won't die permanently and have no gold upkeep. Quote:
|
Re: High PD kinda useless.
BUT..... those 40 troops died every time.
They slowed the advance to allow my archers multiple shots. If I had used my infantry then my archers would have wiped out my infantry in no time. That is the biggest draw back to archers especialy with flaming arrows. That 40 PD saved me many hundreds of troops that I would have killed not counting the enemies efforts if they had not been weakened before they came hand to hand with my infantry. There were three kingdoms that made at least ten respectable efforts between them to take that province. Mind you I did have to replace my infantry a few times as some attacks were very strong. That is what a choke point is. If I had had the money I would have bought more PD. But the other two fronts were sucking me dry. |
Re: High PD kinda useless.
Also, even at 40 PD the price of raising the cost by one is just 40. For e.g. Man, they get 2 Militia, 1 Spearman, 1 Longbowman and 1 Tower Guard. That's less than their recruitment price.
MA Mictlan gets 3 Warriors and 1 Jaguar Warriors, and a Mictlan Priest that can bless the Jaguars! EA Pangaea gets 3 satyrs and a Centaur and a Centaur Warrior at every two points. 41+42 or 83 gold for 6 satyrs, a Centaur Warrior and a Centaur doens't seem that bad to me. LA Pangaea gets 1 Satys (of the Sneak variety) and 1,5 Satyr Hoplites, and additional Satyr and half a Centaur Cataphract. 83 gold for 3 Satyrs, 3 Satyr Hoplites and a Centaur Cataphract? There are of course many nations for which 40 PD is high, but I'm not sure they are the majority. MA and LA Marignon both get Pikeneer, Halberdier and Crossbowman. 41 gp for 3 units is high. LA Jotunheim gets 2 Huskarls and ½ a Jotun Javelinist. 83 gp for 4 humans and one giant is expensive. Other Jotunheim themes get few giants, also becomes "not worth it" faster. But then again, Ermor has nice PD over all the nation's eras. 3 weaker troops and a Hastatus, and the better leader is a mage - that's still good at 41 gp. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.