![]() |
Re: Comparing it to Civ 4..
I quite liked EU2 and I heard EU3 was basically improved in all aspects. Anyway, I prefer dom3 to both.
|
Re: Comparing it to Civ 4..
Quote:
|
Re: Comparing it to Civ 4..
Quote:
|
Re: Comparing it to Civ 4..
Victoria is probably one of the best game ever created. I find the econimic modell somewhat weak but the game has huge potentials.
|
Re: Comparing it to Civ 4..
I love victoria too. you really have to be a hard core gamer to play it though.
|
Re: Comparing it to Civ 4..
Recently incursion. Dungeon Crawl before that. Adom before that.
|
Re: Comparing it to Civ 4..
I think incursion shows a lot of promise. I'm still not sold on the interface, although it has improved. The promising part is that there is so much to do, and almost all of it is fun. If the bugs get worked out, I think it has a shot to rival Crawl.
|
Re: Comparing it to Civ 4..
Quote:
I also started with ADOM (tried others, but ADOM was the first serious one), moved to Crawl, and never had patience to try Nethack or *bands. I did have fun with DoomRL and DwarfFortress when they were released, but they got old pretty fast. I'll probably try DF again when the big update comes... |
Re: Comparing it to Civ 4..
What are Incursion and Victoria? I've never heard of either until now...
|
Re: Comparing it to Civ 4..
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.