.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Dominions 3: The Awakening (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=138)
-   -   Exploit question (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=44495)

K December 18th, 2009 12:54 AM

Re: Exploit question
 
Hey Rdonj,

Making personal attacks muddies the discourse. If you have nothing to add, please refrain from posting.

Trumanator December 18th, 2009 12:59 AM

Re: Exploit question
 
lol, K complaining about muddying the discourse, when every other post he makes has some embittered reference to how he can't abuse MoD anymore.

Tollund December 18th, 2009 01:10 AM

Re: Exploit question
 
You words don't cease to be personal attacks just because you don't name the people you are complaining about. Your post was a giant personal attack against every single person who doesn't agree with you, accusing them of being irrational. It's a standard tactic used by people who want to insult others while still flying under the radar of mods.

rdonj December 18th, 2009 01:49 AM

Re: Exploit question
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by K (Post 722385)
Hey Rdonj,

Making personal attacks muddies the discourse. If you have nothing to add, please refrain from posting.

I have no need to respond to this anyway, as others have convincingly made my arguments for me :)

Way to prove me wrong btw.

K December 18th, 2009 01:57 AM

Re: Exploit question
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rdonj (Post 722389)
Quote:

Originally Posted by K (Post 722385)
Hey Rdonj,

Making personal attacks muddies the discourse. If you have nothing to add, please refrain from posting.

I have no need to respond to this anyway, as others have convincingly made my arguments for me :)

Way to prove me wrong btw.

What is there to prove wrong? You didn't say anything of value.

I expressed an opinion of a disturbing trend I have noticed where people try to get minor tactics in the game banned for no logical reason. You personally attacked me. End of story.

Now this thread sucks. Congratulations.

You did inspire me to find the ignore list, so I have to thank you for that.

rdonj December 18th, 2009 02:07 AM

Re: Exploit question
 
:lol

Okay, y'all can get back to talking about bogus now.

Lingchih December 18th, 2009 02:23 AM

Re: Exploit question
 
I do have a build, atm, that makes Bogus come up quite frequently. No idea why, but I've gotten him three times now. I'm running out of people to put "precious" on, so it is becoming attractive to charm him and his troops.

That said, if I did charm the archer, I would probably re-distribute his orders. Nothing about banning it was said in the game thread. Overlords game, which is kind of a cluster-frack anyway.

Zeldor December 18th, 2009 04:48 AM

Re: Exploit question
 
Someone is trying to argue with feebleminded again? :)

LDiCesare December 18th, 2009 05:26 AM

Re: Exploit question
 
Quote:

Since the devs apparently removed those orders from the game when a previous version of the game had them, I'd say there's a good chance they consider it an exploit as well.
I must say that, as K, I remember the devs saying they didn't feel like it was an exploit. Namely, they want these orders to stay on Bogus's party, and didn't mind if someone copied their orders.

Sombre December 18th, 2009 09:14 AM

Re: Exploit question
 
LDiCesare: Since K seems to have left the thread in a hissy fit, maybe you could point me to where they said it isn't an exploit. I'm not disputing that they did but since you remember it, it would probably be easier for you to find than me and I'd like to see what they said about it.

I don't think their stance has that much bearing on the topic of this thread since the majority of people I've heard from still fall into camp #2. But it would be nice to know.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.