.com.unity Forums
Page 5 of 9 « First 34 5 67 Last »
Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Multiplayer and AARs (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=145)
-   -   Integrity2- EA game: Running (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=48783)

dojango June 14th, 2012 12:32 AM
Re: Integrity2- EA game: Running
 
If you're referring to our little scuffle, there hasn't been any "commander blocking". Movement orders are being resolved in a screwy manner. You moved your armies from province A -> B and C -> B while I moved my armies from B -> C and D -> C. End result? Army A and B fought in province B while C and D fought in province C. I won one of those battles and you won one. That happened twice. So our mega-armies stayed in the same province while our reinforcing armies were slaughtered horribly. Horribly!

Since this happened twice, I can only assume that it is working as intended; and since you can't really expect someone to wait politely in a province while you move in reinforcements from all directions, it is just something to keep in mind when moving troops around. If you hadn't run those 20-30 troops into "province B" my main army would have been there with my reinforcements, and the battle would have gone a lot differently. So I have lost dozens of valiant pixelmen to this situation as well.

odeoderok June 14th, 2012 03:42 AM
Re: Integrity2- EA game: Running
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soyweiser (Post 806273)

Yeah, I feel sorry for odeoderok. But the real fight has only just started. He only lost a lot of income (both gold and gems). Not a lot of real armies so far. (I do think he lost at least one fort under construction). And it went a lot better than I thought it would go, didn't lose any daikini. With only one getting a affliction.

And now I'm looking for air gems :D. Anybody have any spares? Would also be willing to trade gems for blood slaves. (wants the slaves, I needs them. More virgins!)
Hi all, I've been horribly busy and haven't had much time to post. No need to feel sorry, I'm enjoying the situation! And your message was funny.

Bat/man June 14th, 2012 01:10 PM
Re: Integrity2- EA game: Running
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dojango (Post 806438)
If you're referring to our little scuffle, there hasn't been any "commander blocking". Movement orders are being resolved in a screwy manner. You moved your armies from province A -> B and C -> B while I moved my armies from B -> C and D -> C. End result? Army A and B fought in province B while C and D fought in province C. I won one of those battles and you won one.
I'm not talking about moving armies A,B, C, D.

I'm talking that in the last 3 turns 4 scouts have attacked one army. So I'm just asking an end to solo leader attacks.

dojango June 14th, 2012 02:02 PM
Re: Integrity2- EA game: Running
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bat/man (Post 806468)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dojango (Post 806438)
If you're referring to our little scuffle, there hasn't been any "commander blocking". Movement orders are being resolved in a screwy manner. You moved your armies from province A -> B and C -> B while I moved my armies from B -> C and D -> C. End result? Army A and B fought in province B while C and D fought in province C. I won one of those battles and you won one.
I'm not talking about moving armies A,B, C, D.

I'm talking that in the last 3 turns 4 scouts have attacked one army. So I'm just asking an end to solo leader attacks.
When army movements don't go through, the army defaults to patrolling. You're catching scouts who have been hiding in that province, or who are stealthing in to spy on that province (or who are carrying resupply gems for the army that failed to move). :doh:

Bat/man June 14th, 2012 11:02 PM
Re: Integrity2- EA game: Running
 
May I have a 6 hr extension pls?

Soyweiser June 15th, 2012 08:24 AM
Re: Integrity2- EA game: Running
 
So this is easy to check, Bat/man where the scouts carrying gems/items?

Anaconda June 15th, 2012 08:33 AM
Re: Integrity2- EA game: Running
 
Its not my thread but attacking with a scout ignites a different kind of a message/announcement than finding a scout by patrolling. That should tell something about intentions.

Bat/man June 15th, 2012 03:53 PM
Re: Integrity2- EA game: Running
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soyweiser (Post 806518)
So this is easy to check, Bat/man where the scouts carrying gems/items?
I never saw any gems or items but they might have been there. I do know that I didn't get any "sneaking enemy" messages on at least some of these turns.

And when an army is in B going to A, and the scout is going to B - that doesn't seem like a resupply.

Maybe it was. Like I said It seemed to me that cmdr attacks were happening- but I'm great with the game as its gone so far, its been a lot of fun, and dojo has been a gentleman on his nap. Going forward if it happens, I'll send a copy of the turn file to our game organizer.

Soyweiser June 22nd, 2012 10:35 AM
Re: Integrity2- EA game: Running
 
Damn, running out of time today. Could you give me 24 more hours to do my turn?

ghoul31 June 22nd, 2012 01:20 PM
Re: Integrity2- EA game: Running
 
done


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:25 PM.
Page 5 of 9 « First 34 5 67 Last »
Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.