Re: Payback - Vet & intermediate - EA - Running
 

The only other example i know is in the game "Time for a slaughter", i have detailed how i've been more than fair with you. You prolly missed the post.

Concerning this one, Vanheim initiated the move. I gladly accepted his offer because he saved my *** against Caelum, i was beholden to him. And also because you stole one rich land after a barbarian invasion, despite my request to give it back. With or without him i would have attacked you. (beside, you are the only one of my size, i wasn't going against fomo alone)

Now for VVV you are the most obvious target for me, your lands are easy to defend with very small borders to others, your sea prov are also very interesting. As far as i know, everybody is at war actually so whoever i'd have picked it would have been the same situation. I also have good diplomatic relation with vanheim, we did some trade and he kept me posted on the current war situation, if i help him and if he survive he will become a valuable ally.

And globally, for all the game you mention, you are doing no diplo, so you are getting always dodpiled, which is an obvious result.

I remember when i joined shrapnel and started my own games, i refused you at first because i saw a lot of drama in your historic. i don't remember what kind of drama it was but certainly the same as now. I think now i turned to be your new pet peeve since you have joined all my games and therefore we fought a lot. (and i'm glad you did np about that)

I have no rancor against you, i'd have behave this way against anybody and i think i'm playing this game pretty fairly. I did even help you in silent hill while i was myself in big troubles with no expectation of profit or whatever.

Cheers

Re: Payback - Vet & intermediate - EA - Running
 

ok, sorry

Re: Payback - Vet & intermediate - EA - Running
 

May I have a delay of 24h for the next turn ? I will not have any time available tonight (and I Will need some...).

Re: Payback - Vet & intermediate - EA - Running
 

i gave you 36 considering the harsh situation =)

I won't let him die alone therefore i'm ending my nap with fomo
hostilities may start turn 61

Re: Payback - Vet & intermediate - EA - Running
 

Hrmpf... do we have even the slightest chance to kill off this monster?

Re: Payback - Vet & intermediate - EA - Running
 

Certainly not, but I hope to end in a furious and beautiful explosion of Chaos.

KeithZ has won at the time I have believed he would have attacked Pangaea with me. I thought I owed him something because he did not crushed me at the very beginning of the game, and so I prefered the Pangaea attack option. Before taking care of Fomoria. It was stupid regarding machiavelic strategy, but it was obvious to me regarding human commitment.
So it is all my fault, I assume that. But I had no other option, from my point of view.

Sorry and thanks for the Delay.

Re: Payback - Vet & intermediate - EA - Running
 

So why are we still playing this game?

Re: Payback - Vet & intermediate - EA - Running
 

When Num is ready to bow we can end this i guess. At least it's what the charts are saying ^^

Re: Payback - Vet & intermediate - EA - Running
 

I am ready to end the game if you want to. I knew at first turn I have no chance to win with experienced players. I lack experience in lategame, I lack experience in general. I can beat a weaker nation in a weaker position like I did versus Pangaea, I cannot defend myself efficiently against a good nation managed by a good player in a dominant position.

Re: Payback - Vet & intermediate - EA - Running
 

Ok then Keithz is our winner !

Well played !