![]() |
Re: POLL->things we\'d really like in Next Patch (Platinum II)
"7. Added - The Log Window will now return you to the item you had selected the
Last time you were in the window." This is excellent! If the same could be done for other large lists like construction, ship, colonies list it would make things a lot easier in large/late games. |
Re: POLL->things we\'d really like in Next Patch (Platinum II)
Quote:
</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Actaully never thought about it before since this was someone elses idea. However I would think this could work if it was like Atmospheric Converter. After say a year you get 25% more facilities.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">This would not be needed as much, if all the facility abilities could also be used by bases, like research and intel. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...s/confused.gif |
Re: POLL->things we\'d really like in Next Patch (Platinum II)
Quote:
[ November 04, 2002, 19:59: Message edited by: Gandalph ] |
Re: POLL->things we\'d really like in Next Patch (Platinum II)
Bah. I want racial trait restrictions and requirements, and planetary drives http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif
-Paladin |
Re: POLL->things we\'d really like in Next Patch (Platinum II)
Quote:
|
Re: POLL->things we\'d really like in Next Patch (Platinum II)
If a warship on optimum range orders loses all its weapons, it will run for the corners.
So a ship that starts with no weapons will run for it too. |
Re: POLL->things we\'d really like in Next Patch (Platinum II)
6. Fixed - Improved the Transport minister a little. Really like to know what this means too http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...s/confused.gif ?.
I still like my idea of (1) Moddable Ministers to fine tune them? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/shock.gif . DAVID G >When do you think is a good time to close this poll,to send to MM.The poll looks pretty good what people want right now http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif . |
Re: POLL->things we\'d really like in Next Patch (Platinum II)
Quote:
That way you can have a single fleet, a mixed lot of missile and beam-armed warships, with a single logistics-and-repair ship -- and the missile ships will use a good missile strategy, the beam ships will use a good beam strategy, and the logistics ship will run for the (figurative) hills. |
Re: POLL->things we\'d really like in Next Patch (Platinum II)
Quote:
|
Re: POLL->things we\'d really like in Next Patch (Platinum II)
Quote:
Version 1.82: 1. Changed - Ships in combat will now follow their fleet's strategy regardless of whether they are in a combat group or not. That means, if the fleet's strategy is "Maximum range" and you have Troop Transports (each with a single APB) -and- multi-APB warships in the same fleet, and set the fleet to Maximum Range -and- break formation ... the Troop Transports will still try to kinfe-fight with the enemy warships, before dropping off their troops. Why? Because the fleet's "Maximum Range" strategy will OVERRIDE the Troop Transport's "capture planet" design-strategy, even if the trasnports break formation. So, I'd like to see some sort of way to have one or mroe types of ship override the fleet strategy. Perhaps, for each strategy, a list of types, like the list of those types which break formation, would work -- but the list being design types, so you'd not see just "ships" but "troop transports" versus "carriers" and so on. Unless we can get "nested fleets" -- IOW fleets within fleets -- the result will be a nightmare of MM for anyone seeking to use combined arms tactics (bunch of warships, supported by a couple carriers, and backed up by a logistics/repair ship or two and some troop transports). By the current 1.82 setup, we will have to put each type of ship into seperate fleets, and move the fleets together, turn after turn (one turn's movement at a time, or, after the first turn's movement they will start moving one at a time, and NOT join battle as a single grouping ...). That means more MM, more effort, more time to process turns on the player end. I'd like to be able to set fleets up to have seperate Battle Groups, each of which gets it's own strategy; then we could set up a point-blank PDC Aegis group, a Short Range APB "gunline" group, a Medium-range missile group, put the carriers at maximum range on Fighter Attack strategy, and have the troopships try and just bull their way through to the planet -- all in one fleet, with each group focussed on a different strategy, and even formation (putting the PDC/aegis ships into a disperesed formation, at a range where they are spread out among the other Groups, would be a possibility, for example ...). At present, in v1.82, we may have to use multiple fleets for what, before, took only a single fleet to accomplish. *sigh* |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.