Re:Looking for a sub for MA Ermor
 

I managed to make some not so bad orders http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif [didn't check results yet]

P.S. Shard should be already back, hmm...

Re:Looking for a sub for MA Ermor
 

Well, the last kitchen sink has sailed over the wall and the nation of Eriu will almost certainly have nothing of note left after the next turn. GG everybody, without exception every one of you guys I invaded were extremely tenacious and just refused to die when (I felt http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif ) you really should have! Should be an interesting finish as I wouldn't put much money on either of the three leaders at this point, too close to call, but I wouldn't let Arco sit on my lands unmolested too long if I were you. Not going AI yet as I want my last set of orders executed, but plan to next turn.

Re:Looking for a sub for MA Ermor
 

Good game Baalz!

Nice communion work btw. I feared that would happen and teleported in reinforcements or you likely would have won that battle.

You were/are very tenacious in your own right, and have bled me pretty bad. And I am sure there is more to come(:

As to the winner, I would not put any money on me either, as Caelum was allowed to sit and build up too long, and Atlantis has unlimited gem income by now.

With Lolomo's endgame expertise, I would give him the nod over Atlantis. In the Big Game I had a hard time figuring out what Lolomo was doing to me, much less stop it. Like the Big Game he has had eons of time to build up; but unlike the Big Game, he has had 4 capitals instead of one to augment his clams.

But Eriu is not done, you have your capital and other castles, and still have numerous thugs, plus the angels you persuaded Pythium or Marignon to give you(:

No one has given me any Angels(:

Re:Looking for a sub for MA Ermor
 

Lol, nope, those angels were not given, they joined in the attack when you did and soaked up some of my anti-tartarian charming.

Meh, my capital is practically deserted and you've killed 2/3rds of my raiders while I have no unseiged castles to get more. After this turn's battles I really don't expect to have anything worthwhile to captain.

Re:Looking for a sub for MA Ermor
 

Baalz:

If Shard does not get back you can take over Atlantis and see how extremely wrong you were when writing that it is good nation in your guide http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif I could use word pathetic instead when it comes to fighting with cold-immune undead.

Re:Looking for a sub for MA Ermor
 

My tartarians are immune to charm, as they are undead. You may want to try enslave mind next time, or control undead.

Re:Looking for a sub for MA Ermor
 

I'm pretty sure (though could be wrong) that undead are charmable so long as they're not mindless. I know for 100% sure that I've charmed Tartarians before.

Re:Looking for a sub for MA Ermor
 

How would one go about charming something that is already dead? They have no flesh, sex drive, or urge to reproduce?

Re:Looking for a sub for MA Ermor
 

Charm != seduction. Being a magical persuasion I imagine it would effect the areas of the mind susceptible to any bargaining or persuasion, convincing the victim they *want* to work for you based on whatever motivation they have.

Re:Looking for a sub for MA Ermor
 

Caelum have no units that can make any gem producing items. Arco is definitely the nation in the lead right now by a long margin.