Re:Looking for a sub for MA Ermor
 

I bring good news: Mizuko's long reign of terror is over. For countless months this Queen of Elemental Water has rampaged through the lands of Ermor, tearing down temples, killing centurions, and overwatering precious plants. If anyone should care to summon her, she will be available next month. Please do. I don't want to face her again.

Also, as to who is in the lead, I would have to say Arco. Atlantis doesn't seem to be heavily clamming, since they're dropping 30-150 water gems per turn in overland spells.

Re:Looking for a sub for MA Ermor
 

I think Atlantis owns all of the Water provinces(:

Trust me Atlantis has clams out the wazoo. At least I know shard made a lot of them.

Re:Looking for a sub for MA Ermor
 

I really wish he made. He didn't use the potential of Forge, he casted it too early, before getting enough gems and mages able to use it.

Arcoscephale is AT LEAST 2x stronger than Atlantis. How can I think about even harming Arco or Caelum if I can do nothing to small Ermor? Who has 1/10 Tartarians of Arco...

Re:Looking for a sub for MA Ermor
 

Admiral,

I know I am appear to be in the lead from the score graphs, but i have just gained many provinces recently in the war with eriu. I have not had the benefit of them long.

Additionally, as Baalz can attest, I spend 30-50 gems a turn in battle spells(astral travel 25 s gems), mind hunts x 5, ghost riders, fog warriors, will of fates etc.

And I have lost a ton of units that are summoned with gems, ghosts, trolls etc. If I had been at peace for the last 30 turns stockpiling gems and troops, then i would agree.

And i have lost about 20 temples this war, and had many of my own provinces captured. As they say in the movies, "War is Hell!"

As for gor tartarians, I actually have way fewer than you might expect. maybe 6 or 7 that have gear and are used in fighting. Baalz can correct me if I am mistaken. I likely have as many banelords as gor tartarians.

Most of my tartarians are just used as meat shields and are not commanders. I am fearful of the new patch and do not want to be caught with too many insane units that will go independent.

Re:Looking for a sub for MA Ermor
 

It was like LA Ermor only with tartarians. He must have like 500.

Heheh, I did kill a bunch of temples though.

Re:Looking for a sub for MA Ermor
 

lol Baalz.

In truth Tartarians are not a major part of my war package. And I do not think you can really point to any key battle where I had more than 1 gor tartarian, or the tartarians were the key to winning the battle.

I think the banefire archers/ghosts have played more of a role than tartarians in the fighting around your capital. Of course, now I do not have any ghosts left, and precious few archers.

I just realized you killed bogus last turn(:

Re:Looking for a sub for MA Ermor
 

Xietor:

There are just few of us left, so no propaganda will work. Especially so weak http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif

And what did you need tha Bogus for?

Clams
 

well,

To put a sock in your propaganda, i saw Shard when the forge was up with 2 naiads with dwarven hammers on province 228. Wonder what they were making? Spaghetti?

Re: Clams
 

And I have realised that naiads suddenly disappear. With dwarven hammers and othet stuff...

Re:Looking for a sub for MA Ermor
 

Well, so long as it is just 6 or 7 fully kitted out, GoR Tartarians and an equal number of banelords backed up with multiple high level alteration spells and dozens of assassination and raiding spells, I see no reason to worry. Yes, no reason at all...