![]() |
Re: An Eye for an Eye
Eriu is not a bad nation at all. Though 1:1 open fights with giants are not its strongest point http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif
|
Re: An Eye for an Eye
Eriu is a good match for the giants, in that they have great stealth thugs and the giants pd is beyond bad(assuming Utgard's pd is as bad as Jotunheim).
|
Re: An Eye for an Eye
Utgard PD consists of their human subjects. I seem to recall it was decent enough, if nothing special.
|
Re: An Eye for an Eye
From what I remember it pretty much sucked, but well, not like monkey PD sucking style.
|
Re: An Eye for an Eye
Monkey PD will eat you for dessert for such comments!
|
Re: An Eye for an Eye
Quote:
And I know what you're thinking Cleveland and Utgard is already on Phase II of our plan to turn blind werwolves into Rambo-like killing machines. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...es/biggrin.gif |
Re: An Eye for an Eye
Now instead of a Bank of Ulm, for which there was little need since the first Big Game had established a trading house, someone should have opened up an insurance company.
And players could have taken out insurance on thugs and provinces. A typical policy for a province could cover against: Floods, Toad infestation, Locusts, Heavy Snowfalls, and other random events. For a premium one could purchase "key man" insurance that would insure certain thugs and sc's against certain afflictions and death. Minor afflictions could result in a cash payout, where a major affliction may result in a "total loss" being declared under the policy. |
Re: An Eye for an Eye
Quote:
I think. |
Re: An Eye for an Eye
Obviously you would put the poison in your own glass.
|
Re: An Eye for an Eye
Now I haveto watch that film again. Inconceivable!
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.