.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Multiplayer and AARs (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=145)
-   -   The Artifacts Game - [ HOLY S**T MICAH WON!! ] (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=39778)

quantum_mechani January 9th, 2009 05:49 AM

Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
 
I suppose I could have posted before the rollback and collected opinions, but it seemed like that would lead to even more confusion and delay (and possibly even more bitterness about the final outcome). In any case I certainly take no offense at the idea of another admin, if someone wants to volunteer to take Ironhawk's spot and let me go back to being back-up admin. ;)

WraithLord January 9th, 2009 06:16 AM

Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
 
I do :)

I'm already admining two games so this will be my 3rd but I think I'm up to it and would thus be able to take some of the burden from you QM.

One thing to note though is that I'll be completely offline during March (family trip).

quantum_mechani January 9th, 2009 06:33 PM

Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
 
Ok, welcome to our new overlord, Wraithlord!

WraithLord January 9th, 2009 06:49 PM

Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
 
Cool. Glad I can help :)

First order of business is pitch in the effort of finding Utgard a sub. What's that I heard about Baalz taking over?- Is it true?- If so the search over, otherwise I'll make an additional post for a sub.

QM, do you know whether or not namad had a pwd in place?

quantum_mechani January 9th, 2009 06:58 PM

Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WraithLord (Post 665543)
Cool. Glad I can help :)

First order of business is pitch in the effort of finding Utgard a sub. What's that I heard about Baalz taking over?- Is it true?- If so the search over, otherwise I'll make an additional post for a sub.

QM, do you know whether or not namad had a pwd in place?

I do not know about a password, but I changed the llamaserver utgard e-mail to Baalz's, so he should soon be able to tell us. I think he'd prefer if it was a temp sub spot though, so the hunt continues for a perm sub.

Baalz January 9th, 2009 07:06 PM

Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lingchih (Post 665338)
No replies? Then, very well. We are attacking Utgard with all out might this turn.

It does not matter who, if any, takes over Utgard.

If you guys had just avoided a rollback, this would not have had to occur.

Yes, I'm taking over Utgard and I'll be crushing Midgard. Cheers!

Lingchih January 9th, 2009 09:36 PM

Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
 
Welcome Baalz. Thanks very much for subbing.

Sorry all about the rant last night.

Lingchih January 9th, 2009 11:37 PM

Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
 
Oh, and I also rescind the declaration of war on Utgard. I was angry last night, and vented too much. Namad's bugging out and the rollback had nothing to do with Baalz. There's no reason to go to war over something that was not his fault.

Baalz January 10th, 2009 12:30 PM

Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
 
No hard feelings at all, obviously had nothing to do with me. Utgard is, however, going to have to have to withdraw from the anti-gath alliance. Nothing to do with Midgard, just the fact that the state things are in right now leaves the cost benefit at Utgard fighting over scraps ending on the very short list of targets of the next dogpile. I'll be honoring all NAPs (please let me know if you have one with Utgard) and keeping the lands I hold as of this turn. Anyone who doesn't speak up after the next hosting I'll consider to not have a NAP with.

Micah January 10th, 2009 01:20 PM

Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
 
Man, if Calmon's handing out "get out of war with all your conquered provinces free" cards I want one too.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.