![]() |
Re: Balck Holes too soft
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>No ship should be able to survive a black hole no matter what the size!!!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Yeah, but then again, black holes shouldn't drag ships in. Captains antomatically go into orbit of planets & stars, and its no harder to do the same with a black hole.
But if you remove the movement towards center in the BH system, ships would never go near. I would prefer a rotational movement ability for the system, so that ships left in there would circle around, but not fall in. Going with the flow would save you time and fuel. |
Re: Balck Holes too soft
would you rotate slower further from the center?
SPACEWAR (argueably, the first arcade game) had gravity effects, why the heck dont we? edit: it also had a real starfield that panned across the night sky between i-forgot and i-cant-remember latitudes. i bet our starfield is just a bunch of random dots, and i sure dont see it panning either. considering that the stars are the same in every system, i am left with the destinct impression that each system is in about the same place, and any since of scale is lost upon me while playing. if its going to be a random starfield, at least have the decency to randomize it for each system. edit: yes, im trying vainly to be funny. [This message has been edited by Puke (edited 12 October 2001).] |
Re: Balck Holes too soft
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Tileus:
... I would say that Black Wholes should neither ... <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> "Black Wholes" ??? LOL! Looks like the title of a gangsta-rap album! One more typo, and you would've been locked out! |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.