.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Multiplayer and AARs (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=145)
-   -   Sticks and Bones- LA, intermediate players (running) (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=48130)

Bullock January 14th, 2012 10:31 AM

Re: Sticks and Bones- LA, intermediate players (running)
 
Well we were more 2 than 3 with the fast withdraw of TC.

You are playing well but you are losing because you don't do any diplo. It's true for all the 3 games we are both involved (and in war ;))

Thanks for being a great opponent and for fighting 'til the end.

See u !

PS: http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=48229

Groundworm January 15th, 2012 03:38 AM

Re: Sticks and Bones- LA, intermediate players (running)
 
I saw some of your battles, mockingbird. Very entertaining to watch, and you did very well against players who had the advantage over you in both numbers and power. You clearly played well, as I've come to expect from you. Thanks for playing, and hope to see you again!

On another note, I'm not going to be able to dedicate my full attention to this turn right now, so I'm postponing the turn 24 hours. Apologies for the delay.

vargr January 16th, 2012 11:08 AM

Re: Sticks and Bones- LA, intermediate players (running)
 
Diplomacy in this game is specified as binding. Is it still ok to anonymously attack someone you have a NAP with? Just asking as there was some mind hunt attempts against me and I'm not at war atm.

Bullock January 16th, 2012 11:13 AM

Re: Sticks and Bones- LA, intermediate players (running)
 
With binded diplo it shouldn't be allowed ...

Groundworm January 16th, 2012 11:40 AM

Re: Sticks and Bones- LA, intermediate players (running)
 
In the spirit of the game, mind hunting someone you have a NAP with is disallowed. Against the spirit of the game, it is anonymous, so none of us have any way of proving who did it (I've also been subjected to several mind hunt attempts). But Bullock is correct in his assessment, in the end.

Bullock January 16th, 2012 12:07 PM

Re: Sticks and Bones- LA, intermediate players (running)
 
If it's a rule it sounds more like cheating if you breaking it, like some1 recruiting 0g Ettin.

Btw if the caster of mind hunt is caught by an other astral mage don't you have some sufficient info on the caster to know where he comes from ?

Hurmio January 16th, 2012 01:13 PM

Re: Sticks and Bones- LA, intermediate players (running)
 
I've always thought that doing something naughty and not getting caught would not count as breaking a NAP. :p Well, you live and learn.

In this case though, as i'm not "napped" with Midgard, it wouldn't matter. But, i'm not the one to blame for this (or the attacks against Bogarus!). Perhaps there's someone else who has been thinking the way i have or maybe Vargr doesn't have a NAP with everyone?

vargr January 16th, 2012 02:58 PM

Re: Sticks and Bones- LA, intermediate players (running)
 
Looking more closely, one of my provinces has a black candle now, most likely Abysian, and there's a mage in it. So I guess it could be the SoAP as well. Anyway, I think the discussed point was worth bringing up.

Bullock January 16th, 2012 03:27 PM

Re: Sticks and Bones- LA, intermediate players (running)
 
indeed i caught a mage with my SoAP without harming him.

vargr January 16th, 2012 03:37 PM

Re: Sticks and Bones- LA, intermediate players (running)
 
Well, that should be it then. My Dom-fu isn't strong enough to tell the difference in the report text :p Hopefully you recognize my right of dominion in my own lands and we don't have to compete for it. Think of the poor innocent virgins!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.