.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Space Empires: IV & V (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Proportions mod: So confusing! (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=7310)

Sinapus September 20th, 2002 12:55 AM

Re: Proportions mod: So confusing!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by nitey:
Pvk,

Another thing I've noticed. I've been trying to start a new game and if I select an Existing Race template, I get a error (unable to open file). I can create a new race emp file without a problem.

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I think someone mentioned there is an empires folder in Proportions for mod-specific empires. Another thing you can do is put a 'savegame' folder in there and the game will use that when you are saving games. Neat way to keep different game's saves separate. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif

Fyron September 20th, 2002 01:43 AM

Re: Proportions mod: So confusing!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by PvK:
BTW a fan (sorry, I forget which one - Dogscoff? Rollo?) made a utility which auto-runs turns.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I am fairly certain that was made by Master Belisarius. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif

PvK September 22nd, 2002 04:04 AM

Re: Proportions mod: So confusing!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sinapus:
...Another thing you can do is put a 'savegame' folder in there and the game will use that when you are saving games. Neat way to keep different game's saves separate. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Ah! I didn't know that. Good suggestion, thanks!

PvK

PvK September 22nd, 2002 04:10 AM

Re: Proportions mod: So confusing!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by DirectorTsaarx:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by PvK:
Hmm. I wonder if it is possible to fool SE4's "one construction fac per planet" limit by upgrading from a fac without a SY to one that has one... that could be an interesting effect.
PvK

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That's exactly how Suicide Junkie created his "spaceyard enhancers" (or something like that) in P&N... there's a thread about it around here somewhere, including a sample addition to facilities.txt...</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Very good to know. I'll have to give that some thought. <g>

PvK

PvK September 22nd, 2002 04:39 AM

Re: Proportions mod: So confusing!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mylon:
Yes, I appreciate the idea of not being able to make homeworld clones easily, but I would like to see making such clones actually possible to some degree.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">

Ya, I suppose they could be a little easier - at least the colony Versions.

Quote:


The value improvement plants are in themselves terraforming facilities that adjust gravity, temperature, some air conditions, ect. (and there have been plenty of times when my homeworld has been generated with "unpleasant" conditions).

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">

_Value_ improvement doesn't necessarily have anything to do with gravity (if it did, it should require gravitational technology) or atmosphere.

And yes, it's too bad that SE4 makes planetary conditions all on the same random distribution, and with such limited effects. Judging from the one observable solar system we have in real life, we'd have to have a lot more smog before Earth will be less hospitable than any of the other planets... http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif

... still, as with so many things in the game, conditions don't have to be taken literally, or on parity between different types of planets. For instance, an unpleasant homeworld could mean that there is room for artificial improvement, whereas an unpleasant colony world could mean below-average from the standpoint of an alien world. That's what I assumed in thinking of Proportions mod: the reason it is so hard to build things on an alien world is largely because it's going to be extremely inhospitable, just because it will be such different conditions from any your race was used to.

Quote:


Still, 500 turns for a race that specializes in fast building (hardy industrialist + 20% space yard rate) is a tad much..

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">500 turns or 500 years? I have an H.I. race in a current game, and on a planet with 7 million colonists and NO space yard, it will build a CC in 400 years. On one with 60 million people and NO space yard, 260 years. On one with 30 million and a level I space yard, 184.7 years. If you've got a colony that can build a cultural center in only 500 turns (50 years), then maybe I should increase the time required.

Because, as I've said recently on this thread before, a cultural center represents a whole civilization, and mass-producing McDonalds and Wall Mart (and strip mines and industry) doesn't count. All that does is add industry (and blandness) to an existing civilization.

No civilization can be created in 50 years. Cities and industry, maybe. Civilizations, no.

Quote:

50 turns (5 years!) may seem too short for the description, but that is plenty long building time for one facility and I really doubt that anyone could realistically build more than 3 on any particular planet. And this also makes upgrading them actually possible, if we ever get the ability to upgrade one facility at a time and more levels are added.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">A cultural center is not just "a facility".

PvK

PvK September 22nd, 2002 05:10 AM

Re: Proportions mod: So confusing!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Graeme Dice:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">If all you care about is the infrastructure, sure.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That's all that matters for producing materials and constructing ships. Such things would require next to no manpower for an advanced civilization like those in SE4.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">

With the right technology, that's true. However, notice you say "an advanced civilization like those in SE4." What represents that advanced civilization? In standard SE4, nothing. In Proportions, it's represented by the cultural centers. Without the cultural centers, you can have lots of industry, but who's going to provide the authority and direction to put it to use for an empire? A real civilization is not going to "run out of room" at home, and "just need some land to build more factories", or at least, not to the extent abstractly represented by SE4.

Quote:


</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Of course, on the homeworld, there is the advantage that it is the correct atmosphere (composition, pressure, and weather), radiation levels, bioshpere, gravity, and temperature. Overcoming these is part of the massive challenge of creating a productive colony on an alien planet.

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">All of which are mostly irrelevant to automated processors, which already exist on ships, and are far more effective than a facility that covers half a continent.
</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">


Technology is definitely not immune to environmental conditions. Try moving a Honda factory to Venus, and see how well it operates. Could one develop technology to do so? Yes, but it would require time, and experimentation with prototypes in that particular environment. A planet consists of many different environments, and it takes years of study to understand them, let alone to develop technologies that function well in them. All of that takes time, intelligent research, and a lot of expense, especially if the planet is years away from your civilization even in the fastest ships your empire can produce.

I can't think of any facility in Proportions, except for cultural facilities, which would cover half a continent.

Quote:


</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">A Proportions Cultural center represents more than simply industry and infrastructure, however. It represents the culture, society, history, art, drama, economy, as well as the environment that makes it possible to run and sustain large-scale production, reasearch, and so on so that the planet actually contributes to an empire rather than sucking massive resources just to keep it in existence.

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">A planet only requires large amounts of resources from another planet if it cannot produce enough food to feed the population. We're talking about completely untouched planets, with material resources similar to Earth. There's no real reason to send anything to the planet past the initial colony set up materials unless the planet is extremely poor.
</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">


That's completely untrue. Try going to any of the planets in Earth's solar system. Try to find anything to eat. Try to find any consumer goods. Try to find breathable air. Try to find building materials. Try to find technological components. Try to find medicine. Ok, so maybe there's plenty of rock and unrefined iron. If you're lucky, you might be able to develop a process for gathering and processing some frozen indigenous water. How many million people were you planning on moving to this planet? What does it take to keep them alive and willing to be there? You expect them to breed and raise children educated there? You don't want them to form their own independant government? Also, for everything they need, how much does it cost to build, maintain and operate the fleet of transport equipment required to get all that stuff there?

Quote:


</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">The ability in itself to multiply your empire's abilities in a few years' time by colonizing alien worlds and turning them into homeworld clones is exactly what Proportions' design premise rejects. Actually attempting such in reality would, it seems to me, lead to complete bankruptcy, so Proportions is actually still quite generous in this from a realism standpoint, in that it can actually still be very worthwhile to do so.

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">If creating colonies that increase production by an order of magnitude bankrupts the empire, then Britain would have been bankrupted a hundred times over by now. Colonies represent untapped resources, and beyond a very short setup period would easily produce more than they take at the tech levels reached in SE4.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">

How is a colony on a distant alien world going to increase production by an order of magnitude overnight? It seems to me it will mainly involve massive technological and logistical problems, which will at _least_ take a few decades to get up to speed. In Proportions, after just one decade, colonies can provide a major increase in production and other abilities. That seems pretty optimistic to me.

PvK

Skulky September 22nd, 2002 11:38 PM

Re: Proportions mod: So confusing!
 
Wow, a real controversy, or rather heated discussion, my question is slightly simpler: Is there any pointin researching the tech areas like colonial development and large support facilites? Also, can i get rid of my space port and resupply facs on my homeworld(s)?

I think it'd be great if you were to outline some of the basic strategies and mechanics of a mod like this. Anything where fundamental gameplay is changed--(which is a great thing, i'm falling in love with proportions over PBW even, i put on medium events and im having a tough time just expanding, and come some star exploding or plauging event i could have some real trouble)--a short (500-1000 word) manual would be really helpful.

thanks

PvK September 23rd, 2002 01:04 AM

Re: Proportions mod: So confusing!
 
Thanks for the feedback, Skulky!

Quote:

Originally posted by Skulky:
... Is there any pointin researching the tech areas like colonial development ...
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">

If you want to try to maximize the production of a good colony world, yes. It gives you the larger city types, although in some cases there are multiple prerequisites involved. It is also there so you can decide NOT to research it, in order to control the size of facilities you will upgrade to, since SE4 always only offers the largest city to upgrade to, and you might not want to try upgrading to a Megalopolis, or something. AI's can also use this to limit what they try to build.

Quote:

... and large support facilites?
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">

These are mainly useful for military bases on small inhospitable planets. They allow you to add some extra deployment space to a depot or spaceport, which on a domed colony can make a difference in the amount of garrison you can deploy there, without using a whole facility slot on a "Cargo Storage" facility. You might prefer not to have these more expensive Versions showing up when you have "Show Only Latest" toggled on, though, so the tech area there as an option for preference.

Quote:

Also, can i get rid of my space port and resupply facs on my homeworld(s)?
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">

Yes. Those are entirely redundant, and their slots should be used for other nifty facilities.

Quote:


I think it'd be great if you were to outline some of the basic strategies and mechanics of a mod like this. Anything where fundamental gameplay is changed--(which is a great thing, i'm falling in love with proportions over PBW even, i put on medium events and im having a tough time just expanding, and come some star exploding or plauging event i could have some real trouble)--a short (500-1000 word) manual would be really helpful.

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Ok, I'll see if I can find time and inspiration to do that. I've been pretty busy lately, though - I hoped to get a new Version out, but am still mulling over some ideas (mainly mount stuff).

PvK

Mylon September 23rd, 2002 04:05 PM

Re: Proportions mod: So confusing!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by PvK:
500 turns or 500 years? I have an H.I. race in a current game, and on a planet with 7 million colonists and NO space yard, it will build a CC in 400 years. On one with 60 million people and NO space yard, 260 years. On one with 30 million and a level I space yard, 184.7 years. If you've got a colony that can build a cultural center in only 500 turns (50 years), then maybe I should increase the time required.

Because, as I've said recently on this thread before, a cultural center represents a whole civilization, and mass-producing McDonalds and Wall Mart (and strip mines and industry) doesn't count. All that does is add industry (and blandness) to an existing civilization.

No civilization can be created in 50 years. Cities and industry, maybe. Civilizations, no.

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">50 years or 500 turns. Guess what? That was my homeworld that was telling me this. Personally, I think you may be focusing a little too much on making it realistic. A ringworld can be constructed in about 25 turns in vanilla SEIV and can easily take about 200 turns or to fill with just facilities, not including cargo or whatnot. 50 turns seems reasonable for a well developed alien world to build something on the order of a cultural center, while 500 turns seems awfully long for even a homeworld.

Graeme Dice September 24th, 2002 03:58 AM

Re: Proportions mod: So confusing!
 
Quote:

With the right technology, that's true. However, notice you say "an advanced civilization like those in SE4." What represents that advanced civilization? In standard SE4, nothing. In Proportions, it's represented by the cultural centers. Without the cultural centers, you can have lots of industry, but who's going to provide the authority and direction to put it to use for an empire?
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">In standard SE4 the advanced civilization is represented by the facilities, after all, it's not going to take more than 10 million or so people in a single city to exploit most of the planet.

Quote:

A real civilization is not going to "run out of room" at home, and "just need some land to build more factories", or at least, not to the extent abstractly represented by SE4.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I would think that all civilizations would do so at some point when their population grows beyond a standard point.

Quote:

Technology is definitely not immune to environmental conditions. Try moving a Honda factory to Venus, and see how well it operates. Could one develop technology to do so? Yes, but it would require time, and experimentation with prototypes in that particular environment.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">All that it would take to operate a Honda plant on Venus is a pressure dome. Venus has nearly the same gravity as Earth, so the machinery can be identical.

Quote:

A planet consists of many different environments, and it takes years of study to understand them, let alone to develop technologies that function well in them. All of that takes time, intelligent research, and a lot of expense, especially if the planet is years away from your civilization even in the fastest ships your empire can produce.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">At the start of the game, a ship can cross a solar system in two months. In the 1500's, a sailing ship could cross the Atlantic in two months. Futuristic explorers aren't going to be slower than ancient imperialists.

Quote:

I can't think of any facility in Proportions, except for cultural facilities, which would cover half a continent.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Let's say Earth is the model for a medium sized planet, with about 20 facilities on the available land. That's equivalent to a single facility using just slightly less land than all of the U.S.

Quote:

That's completely untrue. Try going to any of the planets in Earth's solar system. Try to find anything to eat. Try to find any consumer goods. Try to find breathable air.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">There are plenty of planets in SE4 that have breathable atmospheres.

Quote:

Try to find building materials. Try to find technological components. Try to find medicine. Ok, so maybe there's plenty of rock and unrefined iron. If you're lucky, you might be able to develop a process for gathering and processing some frozen indigenous water. How many million people were you planning on moving to this planet?
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I was thinking about 10,000 to start, and give them about a decade or two to get the planet to the infrastructure to the point where it's not much more of a problem than building more houses.

[quote]What does it take to keep them alive and willing to be there? You expect them to breed and raise children educated there? You don't want them to form their own independant government? Also, for everything they need, how much does it cost to build, maintain and operate the fleet of transport equipment required to get all that stuff there?

Quote:

How is a colony on a distant alien world going to increase production by an order of magnitude overnight? It seems to me it will mainly involve massive technological and logistical problems, which will at _least_ take a few decades to get up to speed. In Proportions, after just one decade, colonies can provide a major increase in production and other abilities. That seems pretty optimistic to me.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">It seems very pessimistic to me. Remember that a single robo-miner has better mineral extraction performance than a mineral mine that covers the continental U.S.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.