![]() |
Re: (OT) Games That Have Dissapointed You
Eh all you guys bashing Starcraft as a game "not for gamers" and what not... for the most part games on b.net are like that because people who suck or the "non gamers" play on massive money maps. At a pro, or even good skill level the game is VERY strategic (yes there is alot of clicking), dropping, taking cliffs, flanking, countering, intelligence etc. etc. But yea, due to MOO3, and Atrocities?? (whoever posted on MOO3 board) I'll be ordering SEIV (NEVER would have heard of it or even considered buying it if not for Atrocities) as soon as I get my refund.
Anyway on topic... disappointments: MOO3, biggest ever FF8, ok story, game etc. is crap FFX, Square is moving to much for the mass market appeal (eg insanely easy and linear) Warcraft 3... decent but it has alot of stupid flaws that could easily be fixed Myth 3, buggy, boring... bad ai |
Re: (OT) Games That Have Dissapointed You
Quote:
I *thought* WarCraft III was going to be a lot of fun. But even though they have a number of special abilities that the units automatically use, there is still a considerable amount of clicking that must be done. The game centers around your heroes that have multiple special powers that are hotkeyed as well as a half dozen inventory items that are also hot-keyed. I played through the single player campaign and then uninstalled the game. It is truly disappointing that Blizzard is now focusing their efforts on an Online Version of WarCraft instead of working on a successor to StarCraft. |
Re: (OT) Games That Have Dissapointed You
Yup warcraft 3 interface, presentation etc. are very good. But overall the strategy is MAYBE 1/10 of starcrafts. I beat EVERYONE because I can creep faster (kill the neutrals) which gives me insanely powerful heroes that destroy whole armies... strategy... I guess... a little
|
Re: (OT) Games That Have Dissapointed You
Quote:
Solops, are you by chance red/green color blind? That'd make sense to me; the graphics in SMAC were just fine IMO ... nothign to celebrate, but not "awful" either. There IS, however, a specific changed graphics set, for R/G color blind players -- Firaxis included it, IIRc, right on the CD. Dunno what effect that has, or how bad the graphics look, though. Personally, I rather LIKE forestign an entire continent (with Tree Farm adn Hybrid Forest, that's some decent Nutrients and Energy output ... and arid ground doesn't matter ... Great Desert, here we come!) |
Re: (OT) Games That Have Dissapointed You
I saw another game on a store shelf I'd like to try out that I know was buggy when it first came out, but the box said Version 1.2. And that is Pool of Radiance. Has anybody checked this game out, and what do you think?
[ March 10, 2003, 15:24: Message edited by: gregebowman ] |
Re: (OT) Games That Have Dissapointed You
Looks like I'll be getting my new computer in a couple of weeks, and I was wondering if anybody knew anything about the following games:
Freedom Force Microsoft Train Simulator Trainz the new wargame Heart of Iron? (can't remember the exact title) America |
Re: (OT) Games That Have Dissapointed You
bad games
MOO 3 Universal Military Simulator 2 Simgolf (I should have known better) great games Civ 1,2,3 XCom MOO 1,2 Front Page Sports Football Many others don't come to mind right now, but the first 3 "great games" have kept me up all night more than once. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.