Re: Stealth and Scattering Armor bonus
 

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Nope, I've read it. Don't need to read it again.

Just eliminate it please.

Because as someone just said:

"It makes the post unnecessarily long, and waste's everyone's time (esp. low-bandwidth Users)." http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif

Re: Stealth and Scattering Armor bonus
 

You have left in your sig in every post, so you can not use my sig as an argument. You have no ground to stand on there.

Re: Stealth and Scattering Armor bonus
 

Yes I do.

Sounds like your are retracting your:

"It makes the post unnecessarily long, and waste's everyone's time (esp. low-bandwidth Users)." http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif

Re: Stealth and Scattering Armor bonus
 

No, you do not. Your sig is useless. Mine has a function. I am tired of repeating myself, so I will refer you to my previous Posts.

Stop using my words out of context. "it" is quoting the post immediately preceding your post. Do not try to use that case in other cases; it will not work.

Re: Stealth and Scattering Armor bonus
 

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Nope, yours is useless too. We have all read it.

So please remove it. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif

Re: Stealth and Scattering Armor bonus
 

Ok, now you are just being petulant (well, you have been doing that for a while now, but now I point it out). It is obvious that you have no argument, so I am going to end this post-inflation fest now.

Re: Stealth and Scattering Armor bonus
 

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">No, I am not being petulant.

I have a valid point which you are dismissing. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif

Re: Stealth and Scattering Armor bonus
 

Your constant use of http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif exemplifies your current petulance very well.

Your point is not valid, and I will not waste time or space repeating why. I have dismissed it because it is invalid.

[ March 20, 2003, 07:13: Message edited by: Imperator Fyron ]

Re: Stealth and Scattering Armor bonus
 

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">No, it is just pointing out your arguement is not realistic.

You claim to be concerned about peoples time when you say:

"It makes the post unnecessarily long, and waste's everyone's time (esp. low-bandwidth Users)."

but will not change your behaviour to help these people.

So, it is all B.S. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif

Re: Stealth and Scattering Armor bonus
 

My signature has not been read by everyone. Even if it has, people would still find it useful when looking for the things linked in it. This is why it is not pointless. Your quoting of Posts that were made just before your post is useless. It serves no useful purpose what-so-ever. Only someone with an IQ of, say, 0, would not be able to tell that you were responding to the post immediately preceding your post. This is why it is a waste of time and space.

Your argument that my sig is a waste of space holds no ground because yours is more of a waste of space than mine is (as it has no useful links or info in it), and you do not ever remove it from your Posts. You can not use my use of my signature as an argument against my own.

Also, I will ask you again to stop using my statements out of context. My statement about your excessive quoting wasting space has absolutley nothing to do with signatures at all. Do not use it there, for it only makes you look foolish.

If you want to continue your arrogant stubbornness and unwillingness to admit when you are wrong, go right ahead. I am through with this "debate".