.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Multiplayer & AARs (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=62)
-   -   MP game - "Pantheons" Started (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=20331)

Boron September 19th, 2004 08:01 PM

Re: Players
 
Was really shocking the battle .
From my 100 undeads which should prevent routing and kill the horrors about 90 died ... .
If i would have made 1 banelord instead he would have died probably too or at least he wouldn't have done much damage i guess .

With ulm i honestly can't think of any counter to stop your horrors . Basically we all have troubles .


The frustrating is you can strike at will . And we need a significant force to defeat even a 4 seraph "only" horror attack on our capitol . Really horrible http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/frown.gif
You are almost alone defeating 2-3 of us lol .

Lex September 19th, 2004 08:19 PM

Re: Players
 
Well, the bigs boys are on their way. That was just my early game raiding parties. They are about ready to retire now. We're about to really see what Caelum can do in the next few turns.

alexti September 19th, 2004 08:34 PM

Re: Players
 
Quote:

Boron said:
Was really shocking the battle .
From my 100 undeads which should prevent routing and kill the horrors about 90 died ... .
If i would have made 1 banelord instead he would have died probably too or at least he wouldn't have done much damage i guess.


Died from what? I think one Bane Lord plus 2 sauromancer are about equal to 4 seraphs. Bane Lord should stop the horrors, and then it's matter of outspamming seraphs. I guess Bane Lord can defeat seraphs alone. Not that he can kill them, but if they're attacking they will eventually route when it will be their time to go to bed.

It reminds me how I've lost battle because of too many horrors. I was storming fort with a good Caelum army (half-a-dozen of Seraphs, some heavy flying infantry, few Bane Lords and Ice Devils etc). I have defeated defenders easily enough, but there was a Monolith there and, of course, false horrors were first to reach it. So they've totally surrounded the Monolith who had wisely decided not to strike back while Bane Lords and Ice Devils were running rounds without being able to get close to the Monolith. Eventually, my forces routed, though one heroic false horror had managed to overcome Monoliths protection and inflict 1hp of damage http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif


Quote:

Boron said:
The frustrating is you can strike at will . And we need a significant force to defeat even a 4 seraph "only" horror attack on our capitol . Really horrible http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/frown.gif


That's the main strength of Caelum's raiders. It's not as hard to defeat them as to guess where to defeat them http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif

Aku September 21st, 2004 11:55 PM

Re: Players
 
This game crash or something? I havent been able to connect to it for hours now.

The Panther September 22nd, 2004 12:39 AM

Re: Players
 
Well, I have to say that I am now fully convinced that Caelum is the best race in the game. And maybe by a fairly wide margin.

I am playing Caelum for the first time in Slug Fest. I set up the conditions to be unfavorable to Caelum by using hard research and high strength indies. Plus, I don't really know how to play it all that well and have already messed a few things up in the game. Certainly I am nothing compared to a Caelum regular like Cainehill.

But...

We are on turn 27 and my position is as follows:
HOF - top slot
Provinces - 1
Forts - 1 (2 more than anyone else)
Income - 2
Gem income - 1 (nearly twice the 2nd player)
Research - 2, but will take back over first in about two turns since I am putting my mages back to work researching instead of fighting.

And this is with 10 players!

So, despite me trying to make the game conditions difficult for Caelum, I am currently leading anyway. And I don't even have false horrors yet due to the hard research!

I now know why many games do not allow Caelum to be selected as a choice.

alexti September 22nd, 2004 12:53 AM

Re: Players
 
Quote:

The Panther said:I am playing Caelum for the first time in Slug Fest. I set up the conditions to be unfavorable to Caelum by using hard research and high strength indies.

That's about as good as it gets for Caelum. Caelum is very good researcher and lightining bolt is very low research. On top of that many other nations have hard time beating strong indies while it makes little difference to Caelum. And after that, the Caelum will have its usual window of strength well prolonged. I'm fighting (or rather was fighting) nearly everybody in DryLands (very hard research and strong indy) and they've nearly lost. The phase of the game when Caelum is very strong becomes too long and the game can be decide during that time. In other games, with regular research and indy strength Caelum (played by me in one game and by other players in few others) is nowhere as dominant and not in a single game it's a top nation (though in 2 games it's doing quite well, probably around 2nd overall).

Pickles September 22nd, 2004 05:06 AM

Caelum
 
That game is a newby game Panther so 10 game vets should be winning regardless of race. (Of course I fantastically misjudged Ermor's spamming power never mind)

I can never work out what the effect of high research is so I would not have figured those settings as anti Caelum - just pro blood.

I do think it looks like a very strong nation but in normal MP games this is sort of balanced by the fact everyone can jump on you, which is not the case in a team game. Of course it is not a satifactory balance method if everyone has to jump on caelum first off or it dominates but I do not think it is that bad.

Pickles

alexti September 22nd, 2004 08:20 PM

Re: Caelum
 
Is the serve alive? I don't seem to be able to connect today...

The Panther September 22nd, 2004 10:36 PM

Re: Caelum
 
I think all sheap games have crashed, this one included.

The Panther September 22nd, 2004 10:40 PM

Re: Caelum
 
Quote:

Pickles said:
I can never work out what the effect of high research is so I would not have figured those settings as anti Caelum - just pro blood.


I never thought of that before, but you are probably right about the pro-blood thing. Except for a minor diVersion or two to other paths, Mictlan can focus heavily in a single school, i.e., blood magic.

Well, it seemed anti-Caelum to me in my single player tests, for I was very very slow doing everything. But obviously, so was everyone else!

alexti September 22nd, 2004 11:10 PM

Re: Caelum
 
Caelum only needs Evo-2 to start rolling over indies. On top of that the easiest indy for them are knights and heavey cavalry in those reach provinces. Those Caelum armies become virtually unstoppable, and it takes a lot of time in very difficult research to research to counters. And after that the same thing happens with False Horrors at Alt-6.

alexti September 24th, 2004 11:24 PM

Re: Caelum
 
The server is back

Aku September 24th, 2004 11:58 PM

Re: Caelum
 
just caelum and jotum to do turns

Lex September 25th, 2004 01:21 PM

Re: Caelum
 
new turn is up.. let the carnage begin

alexti October 4th, 2004 12:14 AM

Re: Caelum
 
One of our players can't make turns for a few days. He has made password available though. What shall we do?

Pickles October 4th, 2004 03:52 AM

Re: Caelum
 
I do not think you (ie a participant) can do his turns due to the copy protection. Hmm you could get a sub though or anyone could - who is missing?

How many days? We could slow down if he is only going to miss one.

I think is Sheap is listening we should move onto straight quickhost pre tem while we decide.

Pickles

The Panther October 4th, 2004 04:12 AM

Re: Caelum
 
One of you needs to make your partner's turns for him while he is gone. You can do multiple race's turns as long as you do them on the same computer under the same user name. The copy protection allows for a single person to play multiple races in an MP game, which I always thought kind of odd.

In a team game, it does not matter if a single person is playing two races.

Pickles October 4th, 2004 09:12 AM

Re: Caelum
 
Doh! of course you can

So NP then

Pickles

alexti November 6th, 2004 01:54 PM

Re: Caelum
 
The server seems to be down. Can anybody connect?

Aku November 6th, 2004 02:16 PM

Re: Caelum
 
I can't connect either.

Maybe we should just end it because comon me and boron are about dead anyway lol.

alexti November 7th, 2004 01:54 PM

Re: Caelum
 
Ironhawk is offering to restore Sheep hosted games in that thread

But the game seems pretty much decided, so unless Pangaea or C'tis have some secret weapon they would like to try we could end the game now.

Aku November 7th, 2004 02:04 PM

Re: Caelum
 
Me and Boron dont have crap. So it would just be playing out or final turns until you guys decide to kill us.

So no secret weapons. We can end this.

Mark the Merciful November 7th, 2004 05:03 PM

End of game?
 
Good game everyone. It was really interesting, and challenging. Particularly because the development of the game, and my nation, seemed to move to a very different rhythm than in a normal MP game.

I was pretty pleased with the way our team co-ordinated - though there's always room to do more there, if you've got the time to spend on it. I think we spent a lot of the time operating with fairly short-term goals and not enough strategic focus. But, well, it was a first time for all of us, and anyway we won!

Was it worthwhile? Would people play it again?

Mark

Boron November 8th, 2004 04:48 PM

Re: End of game?
 
Quote:

Mark the Merciful said:
Good game everyone. It was really interesting, and challenging. Particularly because the development of the game, and my nation, seemed to move to a very different rhythm than in a normal MP game.

I was pretty pleased with the way our team co-ordinated - though there's always room to do more there, if you've got the time to spend on it. I think we spent a lot of the time operating with fairly short-term goals and not enough strategic focus. But, well, it was a first time for all of us, and anyway we won!

Was it worthwhile? Would people play it again?

Mark

Yeah we 2 had extremely interesting battles http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif . In a teamgame niefelheim is extremely tough http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif .

GG everyone . I think mainly you + caelum decided the victory for your side in earlygame already http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif .


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.