.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Multiplayer and AARs (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=145)
-   -   MP: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Game Over. Noobs Triumph! (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=43195)

atul July 21st, 2009 09:35 AM

Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
 
Just saw my turn (finally), and I know I shouldn't gloat, but...

Caelum, Caelum, Caelum, you never learn.

:rofl:

Lingchih July 21st, 2009 07:41 PM

Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Raiel (Post 702376)

Yes, well, the great demon Murphy has struck again... I'll grant that the capitol battle was always going to be decided by a little luck for either of us. And what beautiful fortune that was, eh?

But the eastern province that cut off my retreat? Come, now... that was simply chaos in action.

Clean up time, I guess.

Actually, that was all carefully planned. That was your only retreat prov. If I could take it and win at the cap, your army was history.

Of course, you are right, I needed a whole lot of luck to make it all work. I just happened to get that luck.

namad July 21st, 2009 08:08 PM

Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
 
a bit of theory from magic the gathering.... IF THE ONLY WAY TO WIN IS TO GET LUCKY: ASSUME YOU WILL GET LUCKY. even if it's a really really long shot a billion to one... if it's the only way assume it will happen and let it happen..

Squirrelloid July 21st, 2009 08:10 PM

Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
 
I have a substitute through thursday. Sorry for the delay over the coming weekend.

namad July 21st, 2009 08:13 PM

Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
 
you are supposed to be able to rely on teammates to play for you during time periods you cannot play... players shouldn't even need to go outside of that pool to look for subs, should they? Your teammates should be much more intimately familiar with the gamestate than your friend who isn't in the game?

rdonj July 21st, 2009 08:22 PM

Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
 
Relying on teammates is a bad idea. Because it's very easy to end up with both nations staling, and with a large, powerful nation like shinuyama at this stage of the game, that would be pretty lame.

Noobs vs Vets has a pool of "alternates" that are theoretically there to pick up these positions. One of them is taking over for ulm atm. But as far as I'm concerned at least as long as someone is playing the nation it's fine.

Squirrelloid July 21st, 2009 09:02 PM

Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
 
the person subbing for me also happens to be a longtime friend of mine who i've discussed the game with to some extent, so he's not exactly going in blind.

Septimius Severus July 22nd, 2009 09:42 PM

Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
 
Pardon my absence, was away at a conference. Glad to see that any issues were resolved.

atul July 23rd, 2009 12:22 AM

Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
 
None Shall Pass.

LumenPlacidum July 23rd, 2009 02:15 AM

Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
 
Heh, Marignon and your building labs for my forces to enjoy while we chase you around. Admittedly, I had been having considerable difficulty getting magical items to these commanders.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.