![]() |
Re: The Star Trek Mod - 1.9.0.2 Update Released
Boran_blok, compare your post to mine:
Quote:
So I'm still confused, how it should work? Either it for components or weapons? We need to wait for clear answer from Atrocities. |
Re: The Star Trek Mod - 1.9.0.2 Update Released
Spelling error: (I think, i'm not native english speaking, so if it's correct tell me)
In pirate ship description: Maintenance costs reduced by 5% do to advanced Technology -Should do be due ? -small t ? (I know I'm nitpicking, but if you fix due you can also fix that) |
Re: The Star Trek Mod - 1.9.0.2 Update Released
Quote:
This is from CompEnhancement.txt: <font class="small">Code:</font><hr /><pre>Weapon Type Requirement The component must be of this weapon type. Any - Any Weapon Type None - Non Weapon Types Only Direct Fire, Seeking, Point-Defense, Warhead</pre><hr /> I think if you want it to work for all components including weapons, you have to omit it. edit:ommitting is not it, so it's either weapons or all the rest. |
Re: The Star Trek Mod - 1.9.0.2 Update Released
Quote:
Im not native english, too, but i seriously think you are right. It must be "due to advanced technology". |
Re: The Star Trek Mod - 1.9.0.2 Update Released
Yep, due.
|
Re: The Star Trek Mod - 1.9.0.2 Update Released
boran_blok: my judgement about satellite mount was based upon its comparison with Large Satellite mount. The damage/tonnage/cost ratio for Large Sat Mount is 1.3/1.0/1.25 = 1.04, but for Sat Mount it is 1.0/0.5/1.0 = 2! So SM is almost twice as effective as LSM here.
|
Re: The Star Trek Mod - 1.9.0.2 Update Released
Another bug: Pirate tractor beam I and II both become available at tractor/repulsor weapons lvl 2, I think the first should come available at lvl 1
<font class="small">Code:</font><hr /><pre> Name := Pirate Tractor Beam I Description := Gravitational beam which pulls enemy ships towards your ship. [..cut..] Number of Tech Req := 2 Tech Area Req 1 := Tractor\Repulser Weapons Tech Level Req 1 := 2 Tech Area Req 2 := Pirate Race Tech Level Req 2 := 1 [..cut..] Name := Pirate Tractor Beam II Description := Gravitational beam which pulls enemy ships towards your ship. [..cut..] Tech Area Req 1 := Tractor\Repulser Weapons Tech Level Req 1 := 2 Tech Area Req 2 := Pirate Race Tech Level Req 2 := 1 [..cut..]</pre><hr /> |
Re: The Star Trek Mod - 1.9.0.2 Update Released
Just a few more possible bugs/typos (v1.9.0.6)
1. Both the 'Bussard Collectors' & the 'Impulse Engines' have supply usage stats, though these components use no supplys when the ship moves. 2. Why do the Pirate race have both a 'Pirate Race Weapon Mount' & a 'Pulse Weapon Mount' (should that not be 'Pirate Pulse Weapon Mount'?). These mounts are identicle in their effects only for different weapons, they are also gained at the same tech level. Maybe they should be merged or made more individual. 3. The Pirate Pulse Disruptors do 5 extra damage at only the cost of -1% accuracy & 5 extra supply use, compared to the standard Pirate Disruptors. This means that there is no real reason to ever use the normal Disruptors only the pulse Version. maybe change these a little (possibly via number 2 above?) 4. 'Laser Beam II' only uses 10 supply per shot while I & III-V use 20! 5. The 'Laser Beam I-III' have different costs to IV-V For I-III Min:30/40/50, Org:0/0/0, Rad:15/20/25 For IV-V Min:10, Org:10, Rad:10 http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/shock.gif I would propose to continue the progression with - IV Min:60, Org:0, Rad:30 V Min:70, Org:0, Rad:35 |
Re: The Star Trek Mod - 1.9.0.2 Update Released
Quote:
|
Re: The Star Trek Mod - 1.9.0.2 Update Released
Quote:
Due to has been widely used for many years as a compound preposition like owing to, but some critics have insisted that due should be used only as an adjective. According to this view, it is incorrect to say The concert was canceled due to the rain, but acceptable to say The cancellation of the concert was due to the rain, where due continues to function as an adjective modifying cancellation. This seems a fine point, however, and since due to is widely used and understood, there seems little reason to avoid using it as a preposition. do - as a command. Thanks. Spelling is not one of my strongest suites. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.