|
Re: Chernobyl
Quote:
Quote:
Here's one for you, Ragnarok: 00000000000011111111000000000 00000000000011100000000111000 00000000000001100000000000000 11000000000000010000000000000 00000100000000000100000000000 00000000010000000001000000000 00000000000001000000010000000 00000000000000000100000100000 00000000000001000000010000100 00100000000000010100000010001 00001010000000000100010000001 00100000100000000000100010000 00100100000000000000000100010 00000101000000000000000001000 00100000011000000000000011001 00001111100011000000000000100 10100010000010011000000000000 10010100100000001011000000000 00001100100100000001011000000 00000000000100100000001011000 00000000000000100010000010011 00000010000000000100001111100 01010000101000000000100000100 00010010000010000000000010001 00000010010000000000000000010 00100000010001000000000000000 01000100000100001000000000000 00000101000000100000100000000 00000000010000001000000010000 00000000000000000010000000010 00000000000000000001000000000 00100000000000000000010000000 00000011000000000000001100000 00000000000111000000001110000 00000000000000000111111110000 00000000 [ April 23, 2004, 20:58: Message edited by: Jack Simth ] |
Re: Chernobyl
if you want a hard cypher to solve, try this:
http://www.bokler.com/pix/eapoe_crypto_ltr.jpg Sure, its already been done - but it took 150 years! |
Re: Chernobyl
Quote:
So tell me, how did you come to the conclusion that I was going to read it to someone? |
Re: Chernobyl
Guys, find another thread already...
|
Re: Chernobyl
Quote:
|
Re: Chernobyl
Quote:
|
Re: Chernobyl
Maybe Timstone should rename the thread "hijacked thread" and move the Chernobyl content to a new thread.
PvK |
Re: Chernobyl
First of all my apologies for hijacking the thread. Won't happen again. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif
Quote:
|
Re: Chernobyl
Quote:
|
Re: Chernobyl
Quote:
On order of the military the people of the powerplant shut off all the 50 different failsaves. This causes the reactor to produce more energy (thus more electrical output). The darkside of this was the gigantic risc of a meltdown. This meltdown doesn't always have to lead to a mushroom, this was averted by a clever maintenance worker who decided to drop the carbon rods into the reactor. Thus preventing a thermal overload. The coolant of the reactor was often given the blame of the overload (because the West used water to cool things down and the Russians use a more efficient carbon based liquid (a little bit more dangerous than water, but far more efficient)), but this is not true. It was a plain and simple economic decision which created this accident. Stupid military guys. If those failsaves were in place the plant didn't produce as much output, but at least it would have still been in operation. "No, we don't fail. So we don't need those pesky failsaves. We are the invincible Red Army." Tss... suckers. Edit: Typo's, typo's, typo's... </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">No offense, but you should check your sources. None of this is true. Here's a link to some facts. http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/chernobyl/inf07.htm Slick. </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Oh dear, seems there is a big mystery going on here... *Twilight Zone theme tune playing in the background.* Okay, please let me say that this is not something I made up or something. I'm not the only smart person around here. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif I'm a mechanical enigneer and thus not a complete stranger to this field of science. I happen to work for a company which designs, produces, installs and maintains rather large industrial pumps, filter installations and generators. My hobby's also include an interest in anything that has to do with fission and fusion. I've read a few (not many) explanations about the Chernobyl accident and a few of them poke of the switching off of the failsaves and the other few spoke of a faulty reactor design. They contradict. Then I saw a nice documentary on Discovery (around 1996 I think (centenial maybe)). That documentary spoke of the failsaves and the alleged coolant. Even when I went to school to study for mechanical enigneer I was taught a few contradictory causes, even the books we had to buy for those classes weren't in agreement. So I ended up with three Versions. 1) Faulty reactor design. 2) Wrong coolant and switching off failsaves. 3) Swithching off failsaves. Because most of the reports spoke of the failsaves and the military involvement, I thought that this was the cause of the accident.Back in those days I didn't have internet, so there was no way for me to check. When I received this link I didn't check the internet because I thought I knew the cause. It wasn't me, it was the one-armed man! |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.