Re: A technical detail
 

"RELATIONS" - wanna a NAP with me, Wish_For_Blood_Slaves? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif

Re: A technical detail
 

is it... is it a SEXY NAP?

Re: A technical detail
 

I tihnk i know how this games going to happen:
1: ctis expands to sea
2: i get dominion killed by mans stealthy preaching and ermor takes my empire then proceeds to crush ctis's land armies
3: either man or ermor proceeds to crush ctis
4: man makes a rush for some vp's so ermor dosnt auto-win (or maybe man just took some of mine when i was dominion killed)
5: big fight between man and ermor, one of them wins the game



o yea, a new turns up

Re: A technical detail
 

Nah, I am not stealth preaching, but my 6 VP do make for a pretty stong dominion.

Re: A technical detail
 

Prophetizing here won't help your dominion http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif

Oh, and I totaly agree with your last statement http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif

Re: A technical detail
 

Na - once all others are off the map, Hellspawn and I are discovering the good side of our souls, will make peace and live happily ever after. But of course only _after_ Mictlan and C'tis are off the map ... http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif

Re: A technical detail
 

don't think I am overlooking you trying to sneak up on my victory point from inside the sea, ermor.

Re: A technical detail
 

No, I do not. I am just trying my very best to win this game. But only time will tell.

Re: A technical detail
 

That was a pretty even fight, all things considered. Kind of wish I got more of your commanders.

Re: A technical detail
 

Yup, your horde of priests was taking down my undead like flies. On the other hand, I was not expecting to win using undeads anyway. On the other hand, the magic beings you killed did hurt.

Still, I always have problems to get my troops properly organized.