Re: Why the average publisher isn\'t much better th
 

Feist is very very good. i think the only reason he is not mentioned is he is so well known.

I am surprised KO does not have a hero named Pug or Calais.

Re: Why the average publisher isn\'t much better th
 

Feist? as in Raymond E Feist? Unknown? On which planet? Surely not Earth. He might not have sold *quite* as many books as Jordan or Martin, but it would be a close race.

If you look at some of the slightly older incarnations of this particular thread...and I can't help but grin at mentioning it...such as the OT Malazan Book of the Fallen, you'll find we've had some quite lively discussion about Feist, Jordan, Martin, Erikson, Williams, etc.

Will some kind administrator please sticky this thread already? It's head keeps getting chopped off and growing back with a new name, Hydra-style.

I loved the Icewind Dale books growing up, and found them much more to my taste than the Dragonlance ones. I very strongly recommend David Drake's King of the Isles series to any R.A.Salvatore fans out there.

Re: Why the average publisher isn\'t much better th
 

We're not stickying threads like this because the top of the forum would get unacceptably cluttered. The current stickies are enough. If it wewre down to the moderators, there'd be three less than now, but we have orders with sound reasoning that prevents it from happening.

Re: Why the average publisher isn\'t much better th
 

I wasn't really serious, Edi. Although it would be nice to have something stable that reflected the attitudes of the forum towards the subject matter and spirit of the game, so that we didn't recycle the same information over and over to every eager new person. Not that it's not fun to talk about, but it's the same conversation every six months or so.

the average publisher isn\'t much better th
 

Well, as I suspected:
While I'm not great fan of Tolkien myself, I think that if you say that Martin is even close, you just demonstrate a lack of understanding the genre and/or lack of reading much good books. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/smirk.gif I surely don't hold it against you, but...
Well, you probably didn't read all that much of it as character development begins even in first trilogy.. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...ies/tongue.gif Though it's true that much of it wasn't by authors' merit but rather by players who played that module out (one of the best published adventures' series, by the way).
Which also speaks a lot. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/smirk.gif
Why I personally didn't read it, it WAS mentioned her (first page iirc). http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif
Just boring. And this by the man who had read much of T$R fantasy in his time. Though usually liked by girls... http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif I have heard that there are some good monsters in there, but I couldn't make myself to dig through his bland language for them... http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/frown.gif
Didn't read it. And probably won't since it's recommended by a man who thinks Jordan great. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif
Read it some years ago. iirc, not bad, but not particularly impressive either. Of course, there was the time I could read EVERYTHING... http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif
Different from what, for Cthulhu's sake?!! "Conman in fantasy setting" is one of the oldest staples of genre! It's even present in one of R.E. Howard's short stories, not to mention Leiber with his Fafhrd & Grey Mouser! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/shock.gif
And Lynch is particularly bad at it also. The only con in the first book which was good thought out is the one played by the Grey King on the main protagonist - and it worked mainly because the said protagonist didn't act as conman (or any criminal) should in the situation (not mentioning the magical help antagonist had). Read O'Henry, for Cthulhu's sake!
By the way, among Russian RPGers such fantasy is characterized by "dice rolling is heard" term. It's seen quite clearly that it was adventure module played out by not particularly good players under a novice DM. Feist is similar BTW, but he at least got his homework as DM done - it's mainly with writing all this down that he has a problem. Also, I don't see how anyone can call Lynch "different" after reading Feist. They are practically twins except Feist is older and was on the market much earlier... http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/smirk.gif
Well, young girls loved them, that's for sure. After some RPG experience they either gained much irony considering these or just stopped to read them... http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif

May it be because KO have read more quality fantasy? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif
Being not a fan of Salvatore (or Greenwood, for that matter!) at all, I think I'll pass. Or is it somewhat better than Drake's usual? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif
Among T$R authors I would also consider Knaak already mentioned here and - just possibly - Gary Gygax himself. He writes not especially good, I must say beforehand, but he's a font of most AD&D initial ideas (as in: beholders, dark elves, and dungeon crawling adventures in general). The girl who'd written Curse of Asure Bonds isn't bad, but her name slips me and it's not very good by itself. Just not bland and not foolish, which is more than can be said about most "dice rolling" fantasy. It's also probably out of print by now.

Re: the average publisher isn\'t much better th
 

Well, the unfortunate truth is, Wrana, that I've read and enjoyed a lot of fiction that just wasn't classic. Stuff that never was, never will be, "the highest quality fantasy", but I still managed to get entertainment and thought out of it. I can give you a very accurate list of the finest fantasy writers in the past 100 years, but I'm sad to say that not every one of them, at every given instance, is enormously readable. They're profound, deep, compelling, etc. but sometimes, yes, one just wants to escape, and not think all that terribly hard, while being taken on a tour of a world unlike our own.

At given points in time, I've enjoyed Martin, I've enjoyed Feist, I've even enjoyed Jordan. They aren't they best thing that ever came down the pike, but on a given day they occupied my brain in ways beneficial.

And even if people are reading crappy fantasy, they're still reading, and it's still fantasy, and that's a good thing in my book. And King of the Isles is 100% free from the Baen free library, so you're welcome to check it out and see for yourself.

Re: the average publisher isn\'t much better th
 

After the first book of Serpentwar, Feist's writing started to get seriously stale. I loved the original Riftwar saga and the Empire trilogy he cowrote with Janny Wurts (who is one of my favorite authors, though she can be pretty wordy sometimes).

J.V. Jones also writes good fantasy, but the Book of Words trilogy can take some getting used. Barbed Coil is a first rate standalone book, though.

I also happen to like Michael Scott Rohan's Winter of the World trilogy. It's a rather original take on several elements of Finnish and Celtic mythology.

Re: the average publisher isn\'t much better th
 

heh. My sense of humor is not apparent at times. I was kidding about a hero named Pug or Calais.

But I do take issue with your condemnation of Feist. Some of his work is not good(talonhawk stuff), but Jimmy the Hand was one of my favorite characters.

Edit-Edi, my comment was directed at Wranna's dislike of Feist, not your comment immediately above mine. sorry for the confusion.

Re: the average publisher isn\'t much better th
 

Uh, hello? Jimmy the Hand is a major character in the original series and also appears in Serpentwar. He's my favorite too, but the books after Serpentwar are nowhere near as good as the older works.

Re: the average publisher isn\'t much better th
 

I like early Feist a lot.

Locke Lamora is about a group of gentlemen-thief-actor-geniuses in a low-fantasy world. It's more about the stuff they can pull off than about the magic, but it's so over-the-top it can only be fantasy. The Feist I like doesn't really have anything in common with Scott Lynches writing. EDIT: It seems I've missed Jimmy the Hand, though.

Name of the Wind is new. It's captivating. It has promise, and great build-up, but I'm not sure how well Rothfuss can deliver once the "past" has been told and it's time to actually move forward in the story.



Tolkien helped make fantasy popular. He was one of the first. That means he made many mistakes that he would have been critized about had he not been one of the first popular ones. I think LotR could be written much better.


It could be written worse, as well. Unfortunately, someone decided to prove it true and wrote LotR, worse. Warning: bad fantasy ahead!

McKiernan's Silver Call starts with "warrows" that keep "sir Tuckerby Underbank's Unfinished Diary and His Accounting of the Winter War" safe, and then one of them (Peregrin "Perry" Fairhill) is hired to retrace his ancestor's steps when group of dwarves wants to reclaim mines of "Kraggen-Cor". Yes, there's a priceless chain mail of "starsilver, silveron, stronger than steel, lighter than down, soft as doeskin." The world is called "Mithgar". The big bad that was killed with the "red arrow" was called "Modru"