![]() |
Re: Noobs vs. Vets II: Mysteria's Revenge. EA, CBM, Sign Up and Discussion.
OK, here is the url for the vets:
http://teamvet.forumotion.net/index.htm Just register for the forum. It will send me an email asking if I want to allow you to enter the forum. When I confirm, you will be in. I guess I should add a #6 to my sig. For serious post. This would be a #6. |
Re: Noobs vs. Vets II: Mysteria's Revenge. EA, CBM, Sign Up and Discussion.
I believe the Team Vet is final. Just need to get confirmation from you guys.
PM me vets. I need to get a final list together. Thanks. |
Re: Noobs vs. Vets II: Mysteria's Revenge. EA, CBM, Sign Up and Discussion.
Quote:
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets II: Mysteria's Revenge. EA, CBM, Sign Up and Discussion.
Quote:
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets II: Mysteria's Revenge. EA, CBM, Sign Up and Discussion.
Quote:
As the noobs would be understrength, I may decide to nullify the vets first choice option (except for Lingchih) to compensate. We do need players with a decent attention span though, yes there may be some MM, that is an issue for the developers to take up, it is part and parcel of the game. You take the good with the bad. I would like to keep the ratios straight if possible, though I prefer the 8 vs 4. Perhaps our vets will consider a 7 vs 5. No more players would be needed (without first choice of course). |
Re: Noobs vs. Vets II: Mysteria's Revenge. EA, CBM, Sign Up and Discussion.
it's only been 3days since this thread was created if you give it time maybe you can recruit a bunch of really new players?
also if the vet team would be willing to have me play on their team i think it would defeat the purpose of the game to have me play on the noob team? I really wanted to play because the premise of the game sounds so cool but if me playing weakens that premise it'd be best for me not too... although i do feel like i would do a lot worse if the irc guys just ignored me for a bit ;) |
Re: Noobs vs. Vets II: Mysteria's Revenge. EA, CBM, Sign Up and Discussion.
Disregard that 7:5 proposal, it would be too lopsided.
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets II: Mysteria's Revenge. EA, CBM, Sign Up and Discussion.
10:5 on Orania seems fairest to me. That keeps the 2 to 1 odds, and the provs per player are 17.2 if you only count land, or 18.6 if you include water.
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets II: Mysteria's Revenge. EA, CBM, Sign Up and Discussion.
Quote:
It is important for all the vets to think of this series of games as a public service for new players 'pro bonum publicum' . As vets, you have both a duty and responsiblity to educate fresh young noob minds and put your personal preferences behind you, while at the same time not seeking to shield them inordinately from the harsh realities of the game. I thank all the vets who have participated or will participate in the future. Keeping this in mind, I charge you all to seek out fellow vets and noobs alike, and urge them to join, stressing the selflessness and nobility of our cause. |
Re: Noobs vs. Vets II: Mysteria's Revenge. EA, CBM, Sign Up and Discussion.
Heh, noble thoughts.
But, in this particular case, I think you're misinterpreting personal preference and hard-earned experience. One of the things that people learn "through the heel" as us Finns say is that too big maps aren't fun on the long term. People get easily overwhelmed by the size of their empires. I know, having had more than 100 provinces in one game. It isn't a preference or weakness of mind, it's something that happens when you cross some threshold. Rules of thumb are good to have: 15 provs per player -> big game; less than 10 -> crowded. 20 per player is huger than Cartman's behind. Just be warned. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.