![]() |
Re: [OT] Nation bashing
Quote:
That's great! I think I'll print this and post it on the bulletin board at work! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Everyone acts as if it were a self-evident truth that the mass media are liberally biased. Where are those liberal TV channels? Could I please sign up for them? All I get on my cable system are center-right channels such as CNN, CNBC, MSNBC, and far-right channels such as the "we distort, you deride", Fox News, owned by equally far-right media tycoon Rupert Murdoch, and assorted christian nutball channels such as the Trinity Broadcasting Network or Pat Robertson's The 700 Club, carried by Fox Family. |
Re: [OT] Nation bashing
Quote:
That's great! I think I'll print this and post it on the bulletin board at work! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif Seriously, though, bringing up Fox doesn't make CNN unbiased any more than bringing up Ari Fleischer makes George Stephanopolous unbiased. Everyone has a bias. Denying that the (vast) majority of mainstream journalists, editors, and reporters hold liberal viewpoints contradicts their own statements. Denying that one's viewpoints color one's reporting is overly optimistic. Overlooking liberal bias in the media while jumping all over Fox News for conservative bias is...umm...*searches for non-inflammatory words*...inconsistent. (Wow! I think it's an entire post without a single inflammatory remark! Do I get a prize? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif )</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yeah your right lets go through the list of all those liberals in the media: Sean Hannity - he's a progressive christian who likes to speak his mind. Chris Matthews - he's a left leaning liberal CNN Pundit Pat Buchanan - he's liberal because all those Jews in Florida voted for him. MSNBC pundit Alan Keyes - he must be liberal because he's black Bill O'Reilly - he's a left wing muckraker Wolf Blitzer - he's a crypto leftist Rob Novak - he's a champion of the poor Tony Snow - always asks Republicans the tough questions Tim Russert - Never lets Republicans off the hook Brit Hume - always fair and balanced EDIT: Oh yeah how could I forget: Rush Limbaugh - the head of Extreme Left talk radio [ February 14, 2003, 04:28: Message edited by: rextorres ] |
Re: [OT] Nation bashing
Quote:
The more I think about that statement the funnier it is. ROFLMAO |
Re: [OT] Nation bashing
[quote]Originally posted by Greybeard:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by rextorres: [QB] Quote:
|
Re: [OT] Nation bashing
Quote:
But yes, I am also really baffled at the hue and cry about 'liberal media' carried by the media in this country. They're all butt-kissing toadies who wouldn't dare to challenge a thing the government Propo^H^H^H^H^H 'Press Secretaries' or 'Spokesmen' or whatever title they have today want to feed them. I listen to NPR (only slightly less cowardly than the commercial networks) and the BBC when possible. BBC is an odd case. At least they aren't beholden to the US government, but they still seem to be a bit blinkered. |
Re: [OT] Nation bashing
I think I've said this before but...
Commercial Media relies on advertising revenue to exist. This means they cannot offend their advertisers, who are mainly corporations that rarely have left wing views. The media companies will hire editors/producers/journalists to complement the generation of advertising revenue, not to jeopardise it. They will occasionally run something that is more "left opinionated" but its usually accompanied but a "balancing" article. This is to push the mythology of the "quest for the truth" that media once may have been. There is nothing more detrimental to a news source than nobody watching/reading/listening because it is obviously biased, because nobody will advertise if nobody is seeing it. Askan |
Re: [OT] Nation bashing
Quote "If the U.S. economy was to collapse that would hurt almost if not all countries on the globe. The only countries that would not be effected would be countries that had no dependence on U.S. imports/exports, no stock in U.S. companies, no U.S. stockholders(people/corporations), receives no type of U.S. aid and no financial/political relations with any country that did. Which country is that? "
You missed the key word of my post. Which was Survive. |
Re: [OT] Nation bashing
All apologies. I see we are both in America. The point is that in most cases no government/people can be held to responsible for another nation's problems. Of course there the exception's like the Opium War when Britain for addictive drugs on the Chinese.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.